Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
The Intersect Steering Committee brings together member elected representatives, elected committee chairs, and Functional Directors of Intersect.
ISC is a collective member driven governing body which will oversee all standing committees and functions within Intersect. It will enable effective collective decision making and communication flows between the Intersect Board, committees, community representatives and Functional Directors.
In turn this will drive forward the growth of Intersect on behalf of the Intersect membership and wider Cardano ecosystem.
4 Community Seats
7 Intersect Committee Chairs (the chairs of the Intersect Committees)
5 Intersect Function Directors & Function Heads
1 Secretary
Secretary
Simo Simovic
No
N/A
Community Member Seat
Phil Lewis
Yes
October
Community Member Seat
Yuki Oishi (Yuta)
Yes
October
Community Member Seat
Sheldon Hunt
Yes
April
Community Member Seat
Fred Tanaka
Yes
April
Civics Committee Chair
Nicolas Cerny
Yes
N/A
Open Source Committee Chair
Elaine Cardenas
Yes
N/A
Technical Steering Committee Chair
Kevin Hammond
Yes
N/A
Budget Committee Chair
Kristijan Kowalsky
Yes
N/A
Membership and Community Committee Chair
Darlington Welsh
Yes
N/A
Product Committee Chair
Samuel Leather
Yes
N/A
Growth and Marketing Committee Chair
Wes Parkison
Yes
N/A
Interim Executive Director
Jack Briggs
Yes
N/A
Director - Operations (Interim)
Nick Cook
Yes
N/A
Head of Product and Service
Lorenzo Bruno
No
N/A
Head of Open Source Office
Christian Taylor
No
N/A
Technical Operations Lead
Matt Davis
No
N/A
Secretary of Open Source Committee
Terrence McCutcheon
No
N/A
Secretary of Civics Committee
Larisa Mcfarlane
No
N/A
Secretary of Budget Committee
Lloyd Duhon
No
N/A
The Intersect Governance Working Group was established by recommendation from the ISC to support and enhance the governance framework of Intersect. Its role is to develop, refine, and recommend governance processes that ensure transparency, accountability, and effective collaboration between Intersect keys stakeholders. While the group does not have decision-making authority, it plays a critical role in shaping governance best practices, aligning committee structures, and fostering strong organizational oversight.
The Intersect Governance Working Group will focus on 4 main areas:
Governance Processes & Alignment – Assess and refine governance structures, roles, and workflows to ensure clarity, efficiency, and strategic alignment.
Committee Composition & Elections – Improve committee structures, ensure balanced representation, and refine election and nomination processes for committee and board elections.
Day-to-Day Governance Support – Provide recommendations to enhance operational governance, compliance, and structured decision-making.
Collaboration Between Key Stakeholders – Strengthen coordination and communication between Intersect members, the ISC, Executive Team, and Board to enhance governance effectiveness.
By focusing on these areas, the Intersect Governance Working Group helps create a governance framework that is transparent, effective, and aligned with the long-term success of Intersect. The working documents resulting from these areas must be completed by the Intersect Governance WG, and all outcomes will be submitted for ratification by the Intersect Steering Committee.
Committees Update
ISC Actions/Update from last week
Committee Election Update
AOB & Meeting Close
Name
Attendance
Role
Voting Seat (Y/N)
Yes
Secretary
N
Jack Briggs
Yes
Interim Executive Director
Y
Nick Cook
Yes
Director - Operations (Interim)
Y
YUTA
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Phil Lewis
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Sheldon Hunt
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Fred Tanaka
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Elaine Cardenas
Yes
OSC Chair
Y
Samuel Leathers
No
Product Chair
Y
Darlington Welsh
Yes
MCC Chair
Y
Kristijan Kowalsky
Yes
CBC Chair
Y
Kevin Hammond
No
TSC Chair
Y
Wes Parkison
Yes
GMC Chair
Y
Nicolas Cerny
Yes
CCC Chair
Y
Christian Taylor
No
Head of OSO
N
Lorenzo Bruno
No
Head of Product
N
Matt Davis
No
Head of Tech Operation
N
Tim Richmond
No
Head of Comms
N
Lloyd Duhon
Yes
Secretary of Budget Committee
N
Larisa Mcfarlane
Yes
Secretary of CCC
N
Terence McCutcheon
Yes
Secretary of OSC
N
Rand McHenry - Member of the Board
Megan Hess - Vice chair of OSC
Kyle Solomon - Vice chair of Product Committee
Valeria Devaux - Observer
Thiago Nunes - Observer
Civics Committee The charter for the Constitutional Amendments Working Group has been approved, and materials were shared for review. Multiple submissions have already been received for the CIP-49 optional DRep compensation grant from wallets, SDKs, and governance tooling teams. An outreach effort is underway, including an upcoming X Space featuring the CIP author. Work continues on governance health KPIs, with a report expected soon.
Membership & Community Committee (MCC) A proposal for updates to member benefits is nearing completion, in collaboration with Intersect staff. The committee is also exploring a request for Intersect to consider funding a minimum number of active community hubs due to their continued value in supporting membership.
Budget Committee The committee discussed network economics and treasury sustainability, highlighting the importance of increasing transaction-fee revenue and diversifying returns. Discussion also covered the impact of a constitutional governance action currently on-chain, which could remove the need for the current budget “info action” step in the future. The committee is preparing contingency process updates depending on the outcome.
The Annual Member Meeting (AMM) survey remains open, and members were asked to encourage completion within committees.
A previously requested joint ISC–Board discussion on the role of members in a Member-Based Organization (MBO) will be raised at the Board’s end-of-month meeting; asynchronous escalation is also planned.
Data on 2025 membership renewal rates is being collected and will be presented to the ISC on 17 November, following Cardano Summit activities.
Participation reached a key milestone with over 168 unique voters, surpassing the 10% validity threshold required for elections. Additional notes:
Voting remains open for one more week.
Members are asked to promote participation across committees.
An X Space will be held later in the week to answer questions and allow candidates to share motivations.
Voting closes Friday at 12:00 UTC.
Publication planned for Friday, 14 November
Comparison of candidate numbers across cycles is still being analyzed; early observations suggest fewer candidates compared to the previous cycle.
It was noted that a protocol upgrade is tentatively targeted for Q1 2026, with readiness activities resuming. The hard fork working group—open to public participation—will be reconvened shortly. As part of the upcoming process, naming the next upgrade after Maxon Rosson will be considered.
Gather data on 2025 membership renewal data and and the committee renewal applications to be presented to ISC on 17 November.
Chairs and secretaries to encourage completion of the AMM Member Survey before it closes.
Committees Update
ISC Actions/Update from last week
Draft Intersect purpose, mission, vision & more
ED Poll & Process Update
Committee Election Update
AOB & Meeting Close
Rand McHenry - Member of the Board
Valeria Devaux - Observer
Thiago Nunes - Observer
Technical Steering Committee (TSC) Updates included ongoing work on the antithesis testing framework, which could support multi-node testing but would require significant funding. The hard fork working group is being re-formed, with an intra-era hard fork anticipated in early 2026 pending community alignment on scope. Evaluation of “linear Leios” continues, with concerns regarding potential transaction reordering, throughput limits, and suitability for decentralized applications. A proposal to increase Plutus transaction limits has progressed to preview testing and is expected on mainnet soon. A community-led disaster-recovery fire drill successfully validated SIP-135, identifying improvements for documentation. The committee is also providing input on the enabling-technology pillar of the Cardano Vision ahead of the Cardano Summit.
Budget Committee Work continues socializing the 2026 budget process with DReps, board members, and the executive team. Several topics—including deposits, fees, staking percentages, and Net Change Limits (NCL)—remain under discussion. Weekly calls are open for participation, and additional budget feedback sessions are scheduled.
Product Committee Recent workshops in Asia informed a refined draft of the Cardano 2030 Vision, subsequently presented in Barcelona with positive reception. Upcoming workshops are planned in Cameroon, Ghana, Buenos Aires, London, Berlin, and additional unspecified locations. The focus is shifting toward strategy and pillar alignment.
Membership & Community Committee (MCC) A draft outline for member benefit updates has been shared. A hubs program working group has reconvened and is exploring options to secure funding—either via Intersect’s internal budget or potentially through Catalyst—with plans to bring a formal request to the ISC or Board.
The Committee Reward Policy implementation process is underway. Members will access a dashboard card in the Intersect member area to accept terms, submit required tax documentation (W-8BEN/W-9), and claim monthly rewards. A four–five-week timeline is expected, placing first payouts around early December, assuming no compliance issues. For the retroactive period (July onward), a single consolidated submission may be used to avoid excessive administrative overhead.
Members were reminded to complete the Annual Member Meeting (AMM) survey, which closes mid-November. No update was available regarding ongoing discussion around the role of Intersect as an MBO due to executive absence.
A first draft of Intersect’s purpose, mission, and vision was presented. The draft aims to:
define why Intersect exists,
describe how it coordinates decentralized processes and supports community-led groups,
clarify its role as an entry point for Cardano contributors and service providers, and
articulate the value of its organizational structure in bridging treasury resources to real-world execution.
The document will evolve based on ISC and survey feedback. A refined version will be shared with members ahead of the AMM for discussion and further iteration. Comments are invited asynchronously via Discord.
The ED candidate sentiment poll opened for members and DReps, running through Friday. Results will inform—but not determine—the next shortlist. A panel comprising Board members, two Intersect staff, and ISC-nominated participants will advance finalists to interviews. Members were encouraged to vote using links distributed in Discord.
Applications closed with 98 total candidates, achieving more candidates than seats across every committee. Voting opened on 27 October and will remain live for two weeks, closing 7 November. Members were asked to vote via the member portal and help amplify official communications. Translation support was provided to increase participation.
Survey: Members encouraged to complete AMM survey before mid-November closure.
Purpose/Mission/Vision Document: Provide feedback via Discord; updated draft to be published pre-AMM.
New Committee Elected Members
Update from Committees
AMM Update
AOB & Meeting Close
Darlington Welsh - Former chair of MCC
Rand McHenry - Member of the Intersect Board
Thiago Nunes - Observer
Two newly elected ISC members were welcomed:
Jose Miguel de Gamboa
Kristijan Kowalsky
Quorum was confirmed. Committee secretaries and observers from the Board and executive team were also present.
Network / Technical Governance (Incident Review) A recent mainnet issue resulted in a chain partition requiring urgent coordinated upgrades by SPOs and tooling providers. A full post-incident review is planned, focusing on responsible disclosure, upgrade processes, and mitigation of version-diversity risks. The engineering and operational response was widely recognized as a positive demonstration of community resilience.
Product Committee Final refinements are underway on the proposed 2030 Vision, Mission & Strategy, incorporating feedback from recent workshops. The current plan is to submit a combined Info Action around epoch 600 (mid-December), with the option for future standalone strategy updates as needed.
Civics Committee A snap election is in progress to ensure the Constitutional Committee maintains quorum and governance continuity. Discussion continues on both interim mitigations and longer-term improvements to CC composition and resilience.
Membership & Community Committee (MCC) The committee is reviewing participation pathways, accountability, and improvements to member benefits. Additionally, the MCC has begun examining the future of community hub engagement, including clarity around previous selections, deliverables, and potential funding models aligned with Intersect priorities.
Budget Committee The committee confirmed that the 2025–26 Net Change Limit proposal (18-month scope) has been completed and is pending Board review. Due to current governance constraints, treasury actions will remain blocked until CC quorum is restored. Committees with approved budgets were advised to prioritize critical spending given recent ADA price volatility.
Open Source Committee Governance and communication improvements for the bug bounty program are underway, together with alignment across ecosystem security stakeholders. The committee will also explore whether adjustments are needed to the incident response program based on lessons learned from the recent network event.
A preview of the 24-hour global virtual event was shared, including the community platform and session-hosting structure. Committees were invited to confirm their presentation/workshop slots to ensure strong participation. Member survey responses (~70+) will inform updated purpose, mission, and 2026 priorities.
Committees were invited to schedule dedicated sessions within the AMM virtual hub to facilitate member engagement.
Name
Attendance
Role
Voting Seat (Y/N)
Yes
Secretary
N
Jack Briggs
No
Interim Executive Director
Y
Nick Cook
No
Director - Operations (Interim)
Y
YUTA
No
Community Member Seat
Y
Phil Lewis
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Sheldon Hunt
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Fred Tanaka
No
Community Member Seat
Y
Elaine Cardenas
No
OSC Chair
Y
Samuel Leathers
Yes
Product Chair
Y
Darlington Welsh
No
MCC Chair
Y
Kristijan Kowalsky
Yes
CBC Chair
Y
Kevin Hammond
Yes
TSC Chair
Y
Wes Parkison
Yes
GMC Chair
Y
Nicolas Cerny
No
CCC Chair
Y
Christian Taylor
No
Head of OSO
N
Lorenzo Bruno
Yes
Head of Product
N
Matt Davis
No
Head of Tech Operation
N
Tim Richmond
No
Head of Comms
N
Lloyd Duhon
Yes
Secretary of Budget Committee
N
Larisa Mcfarlane
Yes
Secretary of CCC
N
Terence McCutcheon
Yes
Secretary of OSC
N
Name
Attendance
Role
Voting Seat (Y/N)
Yes
Secretary
N
Jack Briggs
Yes
Interim Executive Director
Y
Nick Cook
Yes
Director - Operations (Interim)
Y
Sheldon Hunt
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Fred Tanaka
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Kristijan Kowalsky
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Jose Miguel de Gamboa
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Elaine Cardenas
Yes
OSC Chair
Y
Samuel Leathers
No
Product Chair
Y
Maureen Wepngogn
Yes
MCC Chair
Y
Megan Hess
Yes
CBC Chair
Y
Kevin Hammond
Yes
TSC Chair
Y
Tim Harrison
Yes
GMC Chair
Y
Nicolas Cerny
Yes
CCC Chair
Y
Christian Taylor
Yes
Head of OSO
N
Lorenzo Bruno
Yes
Secretary of CPC
N
Bosko Majdanac
Yes
Secretary of TSC
N
Abhik Nag
Yes
Secretary of MCC
N
Lloyd Duhon
No
Secretary of Budget Committee
N
Larisa Mcfarlane
Yes
Secretary of CCC
N
Terence McCutcheon
No
Secretary of OSC & GMC
N
No
WG Lead/Secretary
Phil Lewis
No
ISC Member
Thiago Nunes
Yes
Interim ISC Member
Pedro Lucas
Yes
OSC Chair, Representing two Enterprise Members
Nicholas Cerny
Yes
Civics Committee Chair
Vaibhav S
Yes
GMC Member
Naushad Fouze
yes
Product Committee
Jose Iadicicco
Yes
Community Member
Maureen Wepngong
No
DRep
Terence McCutcheon
Yes
Intersect
Tevo Saks
No
Community Member
Lorenzo Bruno
Yes
Head of Product Curation
Process for Non-Attending Committee Members
A proposed process for removing committee members for non-attendance was discussed. This process is for non-disciplinary reasons and focuses on lack of regular active contributions or absence for eight consecutive weeks (two months).
- Terence McCutcheon (Tex) to refine the proposal to include a committee vote for removal, as suggested by Lorenzo Bruno and Nicolas Cerny.
- Pedro Lucas to present OSC's peer review and attendance tracking method to the Intersect Steering Committee (ISC) as a best practice.
- Tex to ensure clear documentation outlining what constitutes "active contribution" and how it will be measured (e.g., meeting attendance, Discord participation, document contributions).
- Tex and Lorenzo Bruno to finalize the proposal for submission to ISC by Monday for a week's review.
Criteria for Removal
Debate around objective measures for "active contribution" and the role of the chair/secretary vs. committee vote in removals. The idea of missing a certain number of official votes as an objective criterion was raised.
- The refined proposal should clearly state that the chair initiates a vote of no confidence within the committee, rather than unilaterally removing a member.
- Consideration of compensation as a reason for removal (fiduciary responsibility) was highlighted.
Replacement of Removed Members
Discussion on the process for replacing a removed member, considering the minimum committee size (seven members) and proximity to the next election.
- If removal doesn't drop the committee below seven members and an election is less than 90 days away, replacement might not be necessary.
- The process should prioritize inviting the next candidate in line from the previous election results, with the committee also having discretion to select individuals who have shown active interest (e.g., observers).
Addressing Time Zone Challenges
Concerns were raised about committee members in challenging time zones and alternative ways for them to contribute asynchronously.
- Secretaries are expected to proactively inquire about optimal meeting times or consider two-time meetings for global inclusivity.
- Async contributions (e.g., reviewing meeting minutes, contributing to documents) should be recognized as participation and can prevent removal.
Timeline for Implementation
To ensure fairness, any new removal process would officially start counting non-attendance from the date of ISC approval.
- If approved, non-compliant members would start at "week two" with a potential removal date by September 1st, given October elections.
Future Election Planning (October)
A provisional timeline for the October board and committee elections was presented.
- Terence McCutcheon outlined key dates: Board applications open September 1st (for two weeks), followed by voting. Committee applications open after board onboarding is complete. X-spaces and info sessions are planned to engage potential candidates.
Member Compensation/Stipends
Brief discussion on committee member stipends, emphasizing they are "support stipends" or "tokens of appreciation" rather than full compensation, and their role in ensuring commitment.
- This point was acknowledged as important for defining the nature of committee service.
Membership Requirement for Elections
A suggestion was made to implement a three-month membership requirement with KYC for committee elections, mirroring the six-month requirement for board elections.
- Terence McCutcheon will document this suggestion as part of the election process.
Name
Attendance
Role
No
WG Lead/Secretary
Phil Lewis
No
ISC Member
Thiago Nunes
Yes
Interim ISC Member
Pedro Lucas
No
OSC Chair, Representing two Enterprise Members
Nicholas Cerny
Yes
Civics Committee Chair
Vaibhav S
Yes
GMC Member
Jose Iadicicco
Yes
Community Member
Maureen Wepngong
Yes
DRep
Terence McCutcheon
No
Intersect
Tevo Saks
No
Community Member
Lorenzo Bruno
Yes
Head of Product Curation at Intersect
Elaine Cardenas
Yes
Chair of OSC
James Meidinger
Yes
Member of Product Committee
Ken-Erik Ølmheim
Yes
Member of Civics Committee
Ryan Williams
Yes
Discussion Point
Notes
Actions: Responsible / Note
Decision-Making Process Documentation
A draft supplementary document was created to work alongside a BPMN diagram. This document aims to explain the decision-making process for anyone in Intersect, from proposing an idea to its execution. It outlines three levels of decision impact (low, medium, and high) and the roles of various stakeholders, including working groups, committees, the ISC, the Board, and the Intersect team. The document also mentions special cases and timelines. The purpose is to formalize and document a process that already exists in practice.
Lorenzo Bruno will incorporate feedback on the draft document. The group will finalize the document and diagram over the next two weeks. The working group plans to present the refined documentation to the ISC after the next meeting.
Status of Past Recommendations
The status of various recommendations from the "recommendation register" was reviewed. This included a recommendation on board election integrity, a dismissal policy for inactive committee members, and improving candidate presentation. Updates on the progress of each of these were shared.
N/A
New Tools for Participation and Transparency
A new member area for working groups is being developed to increase transparency and participation. It will allow members to see a list of all working groups, their details, and who is active in them. Members will also be able to create or archive working groups through a standardized process. Additionally, the development of a member profile is underway, which will track participation in working groups and elections. It was also suggested to connect Discord accounts to Intersect profiles to better track member engagement.
The new member area for working groups and member profiles is expected to go live in October. The team will consider connecting Discord accounts to track participation. Gintama suggested an AI-powered summary of candidate applications for future elections.
Name
Attendance
Role
Yes
WG Lead/Secretary
Phil Lewis
No
ISC Member
Thiago Nunes
No
Interim ISC Member
Pedro Lucas
No
OSC Chair, Representing two Enterprise Members
Nicholas Cerny
Yes
Civics Committee Chair
Vaibhav S
Yes
GMC Member
Naushad Fouze
No
Product Committee
Jose Iadicicco
Yes
Community Member
Maureen Wepngong
Yes
DRep
Terence McCutcheon
No
Intersect
Tevo Saks
No
Community Member
Lorenzo Bruno
Yes
Head of Product Curation at Intersect
Discussion Point
Notes
Actions: Responsible / Note
Decision-Making Workflow Documentation
The discussion focused on a draft supplementary document designed to accompany the decision-making process diagram. The document's purpose is to explain the process, including who can start an initiative, the three levels of decision impact (low, medium, high), and the roles of various stakeholders. The goal is to provide a clear, documented process for everyone in Intersect to follow. It was noted that this process, while previously undocumented, has already been used successfully by the working group.
Simo Simovic shared the first draft of the supplementary document for review. Gintama and Maureen provided feedback and suggestions for refinement.
Refining the Process and Clarifying Definitions
Feedback was given to refine the document and diagram. A participant suggested clarifying the "impact levels" to specify whether the impact is on Intersect's operations or the broader Cardano ecosystem. The inclusion of subcommittees (specifically the parameter subcommittee) in the diagram was also suggested. Another participant questioned who determines the impact level of a proposal and suggested this responsibility should lie with the body receiving the proposal, not the submitter. Concerns were also raised about the timelines, with a participant feeling that the proposed 5-10 business days for review might be too long for the fast-paced crypto space. The need for faster, asynchronous decision-making (e.g., polls) was also highlighted.
Simo Simovic will incorporate feedback to clarify the impact levels in the document and consider adding subcommittees. He will also work on defining the timeframes for the review process. The working group will continue to refine the process to make it more efficient and user-friendly.
Addressing Operational and Procedural Challenges
Participants identified several procedural challenges not fully captured by the initial draft: who to contact to start a process, how to ensure proposals are reviewed in a timely manner, and what happens when committees or working groups decline a proposal. A participant raised a special case, the "no confidence" vote in the Board, as an example of a high-impact situation that falls outside typical committee processes.
Simo Simovic will add a more detailed "story" to accompany the diagram, explaining who to contact and the expected timelines. A participant offered to provide more details on the "no confidence" special case, for internal review. The group also acknowledged the need for a mechanism to address cross-committee collaboration and to handle an influx of low-quality proposals.
Engagement and Accountability
A participant noted that the process can be slow due to the voluntary nature of the work and a lack of engagement from some members. The importance of leadership in pushing for contributions and meeting deadlines was emphasized. A participant also raised a question about accountability, asking what happens if people fail to meet the proposed timelines.
N/A
Proposal for the LATAM Summit
A participant provided a spontaneous presentation about a venue in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, for a potential Intersect presence at a LATAM summit. The participant described the venue's features and offered to help with arrangements.
Simo Simovic indicated he would follow up with the appropriate individuals at Intersect to discuss the proposal further.
Next Steps
The next steps were outlined to continue refining the decision-making documentation. The goal is to create a complete package of documents (the diagram, the explanatory text, and the timelines) that can be published on the knowledge base.
Simo Simovic will incorporate all feedback into a final, refined version of the documents. The group will then review this version before presenting it to the ISC for publication.
Name
Attendance
Role
Yes
WG Lead/Secretary
Phil Lewis
No
ISC Member
Thiago Nunes
No
Interim ISC Member
Pedro Lucas
No
OSC Chair, Representing two Enterprise Members
Nicholas Cerny
No
Civics Committee Chair
Vaibhav S
Yes
GMC Member
Naushad Fouze
No
Product Committee
Jose Iadicicco
Yes
Community Member
Maureen Wepngong
Yes
DRep
Terence McCutcheon
Yes
Intersect
Tevo Saks
No
Community Member
Lorenzo Bruno
Yes
Head of Product Curation at Intersect
Discussion Point
Notes
Actions: Responsible / Note
BPMN (Business Process Model and Notation)
The team reviewed the BPMN diagram created by Simo to map Intersect's decision-making process. The goal is to create a single, comprehensive process flow. Discussions highlighted the need to define separate lanes for working groups and committees, and to account for decisions that require input from multiple groups. The importance of adding a timeline to the process documentation was also raised, with a suggestion to define priority and effort levels to manage expectations.
Simo Simovic & Lorenzo Bruno: Work on a new version of the BPMN to incorporate all suggestions, including distinct swim lanes for working groups and committees.
Committee Stipend Policy
The group revisited an ISC decision from November 2024 regarding stipends for committee members (500 ADA/month for members, 1,000 ADA/month for chairs). Discussion centered on the nature of these payments—whether they are "tokens of appreciation" or compensation for work. Concerns were raised about potential reputational risk if non-participating members receive stipends. Suggestions were made to connect payments to a form of accountability, such as attendance or a clear demonstration of value.
Updates on Past Board Election Questions
Gintama asked for an update on the status of the recommendations for board elections questions. Lorenzo confirmed that the recommendations had been approved with minor additions and that the new application questions are with the board for final sign-off.
Committees Update
ISC Actions/Update from last week
Committee Service Rewards
AOB & Meeting Close
Name
Attendance
Role
Voting Seat (Y/N)
Yes
Secretary
N
Jack Briggs
No
Interim Executive Director
Y
Nick Cook
No
Director - Operations (Interim)
Y
YUTA
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Phil Lewis
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Sheldon Hunt
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Fred Tanaka
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Elaine Cardenas
Yes
OSC Chair
Y
Samuel Leathers
Yes
Product Chair
Y
Darlington Welsh
No
MCC Chair
Y
Kristijan Kowalsky
Yes
CBC Chair
Y
Kevin Hammond
Yes
TSC Chair
Y
Wes Parkison
Yes
GMC Chair
Y
Nicolas Cerny
Yes
CCC Chair
Y
Christian Taylor
Yes
Head of OSO
N
Lorenzo Bruno
No
Head of Product
N
Matt Davis
No
Head of Tech Operation
N
Tim Richmond
No
Head of Comms
N
Duncan Soutar
No
Secretary of TSC
N
Lloyd Duhon
Yes
Secretary of Budget Committee
N
Larisa Mcfarlane
Yes
Secretary of CCC
N
Terence McCutcheon
Yes
Secretary of OSC
N
Kyle Solomon - Vice Chair of Product Committee
Thiago Nunes - Observer
Open Source Committee (OSC) Leadership change reported with a new acting chair. The developer advocate program is being finalized, and the maintainer retainer program has one confirmed project. Intersect will also incubate its first community project (Evolution SDK with No Witness Labs), under a non-funding support framework.
Growth & Marketing Committee (GMC) Social presence doubled through a Rare Evo 2026 ticket giveaway and new posting strategy. Positive sentiment for Cardano is increasing across Asia, with recent events showing stronger engagement.
Civics Committee The committee finalized the charter for the Governance Health Working Group and discussed the long-term possibility of a constitution amendment process.
Budget Committee A call was made for more responses to the retrospective survey. Work has begun on the 2026 budget framework, with a plan to be presented to the board in September. The process is expected to start in Q1 2026, using structured discussions facilitated by the committee.
Product Committee A remote workshop was held, and findings are being integrated with Rare Evo outcomes to refine Cardano’s vision and strategy. Community workshops and discovery calls are being promoted, and coordination for Token 2049 is underway.
Community Updates Reports from Japan and Hong Kong highlighted oversubscribed events, strong regional engagement, and growing institutional interest in Cardano, especially around digital asset treasury opportunities.
Two follow-ups were noted:
ISC Survey: Agreement remains to launch mid-September (10–12th), running for 6–8 weeks, with results to be published ahead of the November AMM.
Committee Rewards Policy: The first draft was presented, now titled Service Rewards to frame it as recognition rather than salary.
The draft policy outlines eligibility, scope, and terms of committee rewards:
Eligibility: All elected committee members are included, up to two rewards per person. Intersect staff and board members are excluded.
Dismissal & Opt-out: Members dismissed for inactivity are ineligible. Rewards are optional for members who choose not to accept them.
Rates: 500 ADA/month for members, 1,000 ADA/month for chairs.
Timeline: Payments aligned with the budget cycle, June 2025 – May 2026, with no backdating.
Payment Options: Debate centered on monthly versus quarterly disbursements. Some favored quarterly for efficiency, while others preferred monthly for fairness and flexibility. Possible payment mechanisms include decentralized claimable rewards or custodial solutions, with final feasibility to be assessed by the executive/finance team.
Oversight: Clarification was requested on who holds final decision-making authority.
Safeguards: Suggestion was made that proposals should include freezing rewards if a member is inactive for four consecutive weeks, even prior to formal dismissal, and potential sign-off requirements by committee leadership.
The draft will be updated with these inputs, including decision-making clarity, and brought back within two weeks. The aim is to finalize the policy by mid-September, enabling payments to start shortly after.
Service Rewards Policy: Revise draft with feedback (payment cycles, eligibility, oversight, safeguards); aim for ISC approval by mid-September.
Name
Attendance
Role
Yes
WG Lead/Secretary
Phil Lewis
Yes
ISC Member
Thiago Nunes
No
Interim ISC Member
Pedro Lucas
No
OSC Chair, Representing two Enterprise Members
Nicholas Cerny
Yes
Civics Committee Chair
Vaibhav S
Yes
GMC Member
Jose Iadicicco
No
Community Member
Maureen Wepngong
No
DRep
Terence McCutcheon
Yes
Intersect
Tevo Saks
No
Community Member
Lorenzo Bruno
Yes
Head of Product Curation at Intersect
Elaine Cardenas
No
Chair of OSC
James Meidinger
Yes
Member of Product Committee
Ken-Erik Ølmheim
Yes
Member of Civics Committee
Recording: Intersect Governance WG Weekly - 2025/09/25 15:56 CEST - Recording
Transcript: Intersect Governance WG Weekly - 2025/09/25 15:56 CEST - Transcript
Decision-Making Process Workflow
Next Priority for the WG
Discussion Point
Notes
Actions: Responsible / Note
Decision-Making Process Documentation
The group is finalizing a diagram and a supplementary document that formalize Intersect’s decision-making process. The process itself already exists, but it hasn't been clearly documented or adopted. A participant clarified that the group's role is to propose this formalized process as a single source of truth for ISC and Board consideration, not to unilaterally impose it. The group agreed that the final documents are ready to be presented to the ISC for review and feedback.
Simo Simovic will add the formalized decision-making process to the ISC agenda for an upcoming meeting.
Dismissal and Replacement Policy
A participant raised concerns that the current dismissal policy is too lenient, as a member can avoid dismissal simply by attending one meeting every eight weeks. This is particularly relevant given the upcoming stipends for voting members. The discussion highlighted differing opinions on how to handle this. Some believed committees should have the autonomy to decide on dismissal criteria and processes themselves, with the Board's support. Others argued for stricter, more formal disciplinary measures, such as temporarily barring a dismissed member from running in future elections, though this may conflict with the Cardano ethos of encouraging participation. The group agreed the current policy is a low bar and needs to be revisited, with a focus on a clearer definition of "active contribution."
The group will revisit and refine the current dismissal policy. Simo Simovic will work with a team member to review the existing document on committee responsibilities as a starting point. The group agreed to focus on defining "active/regular contributions" first before finalizing changes to the dismissal policy.
Member Participation and Accountability
There was a broad discussion about member participation and accountability. A participant noted that some committee members are not actively contributing, and asked whether committee chairs or secretaries have tried to reach out to them. The consensus was that committees should be empowered to address this themselves. The conversation also touched upon the lack of public awareness regarding committee activities and participation.
Next Steps
The working group's next steps involve taking the finalized decision-making process to the ISC and continuing the discussion on member responsibilities. A participant mentioned that the open-source committee already has a process in place for member replacement, which could serve as a useful precedent.
The working group's next call will continue the discussion on defining "active/regular contributions" and reviewing the existing documents on member responsibilities.
Yes
WG Lead/Secretary
Jack Briggs
No
Director of Ecosystem & Governance
Lawrence Clark
No
Head of Operation
Nick Cook
No
Head of Membership & Community Hubs
Phil Lewis
Yes
ISC Member
Thiago Nunes
No
Interim ISC Member
Pedro Lucas
No
OSC Chair, Representing two Enterprise Members
Nicholas Cerny
No
Civics Committee member
Vaibhav S
Yes
GMC Member
Naushad Fouze
Yes
Product Committee
Jose Iadicicco
Yes
Community Member
Tevo Saks
Yes
Community Member
Recording: Intersect Governance WG Weekly - 2025/04/01 15:58 CEST - Recording
Transcript: Intersect Governance WG Weekly - 2025/04/01 15:58 CEST - Transcript
Weekly Meeting Timing
Review current Intersect decision making process document
Meeting Schedule & Time Change
It was noted that the local time change in Serbia affected the scheduled meeting time.
A consensus was reached to adopt a fixed UTC schedule (1 p.m. UTC) for consistency.
Simo to update the meeting schedule using UTC time and confirm the new time with the group.
Governance WG Priorities
The group reaffirmed three main priorities: (1) Review current intersect governance and identify improvement areas; (2) Improve board election processes; (3) Review and refine committee election procedures using past election data.
Simo to create the governance document summarizing the current state for review; all members provide feedback.
Committee Election Policies & Eligibility
Discussion centered on whether there should be policies regarding multiple terms and minimum participation before standing for elections, given that current documentation lacks clear rules.
Election Vulnerabilities & Postmortem Analysis
Concerns were raised about vulnerabilities in upcoming elections (e.g., potential manipulation through mass registration or low entry thresholds).
Jose and Malik would like to be included in postmortem analysis of previous elections and review registration data for vulnerabilities.
Documenting Current Governance Processes
A document summarizing the bylaws, roles, and current decision-making processes was presented. The discussion emphasized capturing the present state accurately before proposing improvements.
Simo to update the document based on collective feedback; all members to review and identify any gaps.
Centralized Document Sharing
The need for a single, accessible repository for all governance-related documents was highlighted to improve transparency and ease of access.
Simo to create and share a centralized folder with all working group documents.
Capacity & Workload for Documentation
There were questions regarding available capacity to work on documentation for board elections and other priorities. Simo has confirmed that he has capacity to work on this, if he needs additional support he will ask for it.
Scheduling & Prioritization of Future Tasks
The group suggested establishing an overarching timeline for discussion topics and action items (e.g., internal state review, board elections, other discussions) to manage workload effectively.
Simo to incorporate a timeline with expected deadlines into planning documents for future sessions.
Wrap-Up & Next Steps
The meeting concluded with a commitment to review the updated documents, follow up on identified actions, and prepare for the next meeting.
Simo to lead the follow-up on action items and ensure that updated documents and schedules are circulated ahead of the next meeting.
Committees Update
Committee Service Rewards Review and Vote
Committee Elections Questions and Info page
MCC Charter - presentation
Draft member survey
AOB & Meeting Close
Tim Harrison - Vice Chair of GMC
Kyle Solomon - Vice Chair of Product Committee
Thiago Nunes - Observer
Civics Committee Launching a Discord forum on constitutional amendments and planning an X Space with incoming/outgoing CC members. Governance Health WG is defining KPIs, Education WG is mapping gaps, and the CC Election WG will hold a follow-up workshop on 29 September.
Technical Steering Committee (TSC) Revised remit under review; presentation expected next week. Reviewing “linear Leios” SIP, which may affect budgets. Preparing a governance action to raise execution units and exploring a new minimum margin parameter. Hard fork unlikely in 2025; intra-era hard fork targeted for early 2026. Fire drill pending officer appointment.
Budget Committee Approved its primary functions (budget process, oversight/audit, and communication) plus supporting roles (DRep relations and working groups). Will present the 2026 budget process and functions to the board, with an info action planned for late October/early November.
Member & Community Committee (MCC) Updated charter shifts focus to member benefits and non-financial hub support. Key focus areas to be shared soon.
Product Committee Workshops ongoing with a calendar published for participation.
Open Source Committee (OSC) Budget rollout progressing with statements of work approved; full implementation expected by November.
A revised draft of the Service Rewards Policy was presented, balancing accountability with simplicity. The proposal allows members to claim 50% of the reward automatically and the other 50% upon submitting a brief activity summary (~500 characters). Legal review will be required to ensure compliance with employment law, as conditions on stipends could create contractual issues.
The ISC agreed to vote on the current version with the caveat that legal review may require revisions, which would return for approval. A majority vote approved sending the draft to legal, with the understanding that changes would be re-submitted for ISC confirmation.
The ISC discussed refining the additional questions for upcoming committee elections. Concerns were raised that some questions overlap (e.g., feedback incorporation vs. communication) and that “community” should be clarified as “membership” in the ISC context. Members suggested defining explicit candidate criteria (e.g., leadership, commitment, understanding of Intersect) and ensuring questions capture candidates’ vision for improving the organization. A revised draft of criteria and questions will be circulated in Discord this week for finalization.
Members were invited to provide asynchronous feedback on the updated MCC charter shared in Discord. No further discussion was required during the call.
The ISC confirmed that Phil’s earlier proposal on Intersect’s role and responsibilities will be integrated into a broader member survey for the Annual Member Meeting (AMM). The survey will open next week, remain active for six weeks, and close two weeks before the AMM (planned for late November). Results will inform discussions on Intersect’s 2026 direction and subsequent member voting.
Service Rewards Policy: Send draft to legal review; return for ISC approval if changes required.
Committee Elections: Finalize criteria and additional questions for ISC election seats; share updated draft in Discord.
Member Survey: Finalize and launch next week; close two weeks before AMM in late November.
Committees Update
ISC Actions/Update from last week
ISC Committee Elections criteria to join and questions
AMM/ISC member survey
AOB & Meeting Close
Adam Dean - Vice Chair of TSC
Thiago Nunes - Observer
Product Committee The committee is progressing with regional workshops (Osaka, Tokyo, Singapore, Barcelona) and surveys, including outreach to the Japanese community. Data suggests a growing consensus around Cardano’s vision and strategy. A revised draft, with more accessible language, is expected by early November for on-chain voting.
Open Source Committee (OSC) Developer contracts are being finalized, and the maintainer retainer program is advancing, with interview questions prepared. The next step is to begin matching maintainers with projects that applied.
Civics Committee A new Constitutional Amendments Working Group has been created to facilitate—not decide—proposals on constitutional change. The scope of the optional DRep compensation grant has been widened to cover not only wallets but also dApps and SDK providers.
Budget Committee A draft budget framework was presented, stressing inclusivity and transparency. The goal is to launch the 2026 budget process in February, with voting in March and payouts by April/May (to avoid long funding gaps). Multi-year budgets are under consideration for certain proposals. The draft will be translated into Japanese for upcoming community events.
Technical Steering Committee (TSC) Work continues on hiring a security incident manager (in collaboration with the OSC) and re-establishing the Hard Fork Working Group as a standing body. The TSC is exploring fixed April/October windows for future hard forks to align ecosystem updates and support intra-era upgrades.
Growth & Marketing Committee (GMC) Preparations for Token 2049 are ahead of expectations, with over 1,400 sign-ups (well above the 900 KPI). More than 20 projects will showcase at side events. Positive sentiment from VCs highlights potential for Cardano-focused venture funds, complementing treasury and Catalyst mechanisms.
The committee reward policy, which was approved by ISC last week, is currently under legal review. If changes are required, a revised version will be re-shared with ISC. If no major changes are needed, the policy will stand as approved and can move forward to implementation.
Criteria and updated candidate questions have been drafted and circulated. Slides for election decks are being compiled, with small edits suggested (e.g., using “member sentiment” instead of “community sentiment”). Final reviews are still required from the Product, GMC, and MCC committees. ISC slides are finalized, and ISC members gave a thumbs up to the final version.
The final draft of the ISC Survey was shared for review. Launch is scheduled for the end of September, with the survey open for six weeks and results to be published at the November AMM. The survey includes tailored sections for different membership categories and questions covering both past and future experiences. A target of 150+ responses has been set, with GMC assisting on promotion and communications.
A demonstration was provided of the smart contract–based treasury disbursement dashboard, which shows milestone tracking, evidence submission, and contract status for funded projects. Remaining contracts are undergoing legal review.
Board elections have already reached quorum (10% of active members) with four days left. Members agreed on the need for neutral, unified communications encouraging broader participation, to be coordinated through committee secretaries and official channels.
AMM/ISC Survey: Finalize the survey this week and publish it.
Rewards Policy: Await legal review. If changes are required, a revised version will be re-shared with ISC. If no major changes, the policy will stand as approved and move to implementation.
Name
Attendance
Role
Voting Seat (Y/N)
No
Secretary
N
Jack Briggs
Yes
Interim Executive Director
Y
Nick Cook
No
Director - Operations (Interim)
Y
YUTA
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Phil Lewis
No
Community Member Seat
Y
Sheldon Hunt
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Fred Tanaka
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Elaine Cardenas
Yes
OSC Chair
Y
Samuel Leathers
No
Product Chair
Y
Darlington Welsh
Yes
MCC Chair
Y
Kristijan Kowalsky
Yes
CBC Chair
Y
Kevin Hammond
Yes
TSC Chair
Y
Wes Parkison
Yes
GMC Chair
Y
Nicolas Cerny
Yes
CCC Chair
Y
Christian Taylor
Yes
Head of OSO
N
Lorenzo Bruno
Yes
Head of Product
N
Matt Davis
No
Head of Tech Operation
N
Tim Richmond
No
Head of Comms
N
Duncan Soutar
No
Secretary of TSC
N
Lloyd Duhon
Yes
Secretary of Budget Committee
N
Larisa Mcfarlane
Yes
Secretary of CCC
N
Terence McCutcheon
No
Secretary of OSC
N
Name
Attendance
Role
Voting Seat (Y/N)
No
Secretary
N
Jack Briggs
Yes
Interim Executive Director
Y
Nick Cook
No
Director - Operations (Interim)
Y
YUTA
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Phil Lewis
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Sheldon Hunt
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Fred Tanaka
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Elaine Cardenas
Yes
OSC Chair
Y
Samuel Leathers
Yes
Product Chair
Y
Darlington Welsh
Yes
MCC Chair
Y
Kristijan Kowalsky
Yes
CBC Chair
Y
Kevin Hammond
No
TSC Chair
Y
Wes Parkison
Yes
GMC Chair
Y
Nicolas Cerny
Yes
CCC Chair
Y
Christian Taylor
Yes
Head of OSO
N
Lorenzo Bruno
No
Head of Product
N
Matt Davis
No
Head of Tech Operation
N
Tim Richmond
No
Head of Comms
N
Duncan Soutar
No
Secretary of TSC
N
Lloyd Duhon
Yes
Secretary of Budget Committee
N
Larisa Mcfarlane
Yes
Secretary of CCC
N
Terence McCutcheon
Yes
Secretary of OSC
N
Name
Attendance
Role
Yes
WG Lead/Secretary
Jack Briggs
No
Interim Executive Director
Nick Cook
No
Director - Operations (Interim)
Phil Lewis
Yes
ISC Member
Thiago Nunes
Yes
Interim ISC Member
Pedro Lucas
No
OSC Chair, Representing two Enterprise Members
Nicholas Cerny
Yes
Civics Committee member
Vaibhav S
Yes
GMC Member
Naushad Fouze
No
Product Committee
Jose Iadicicco
No
Community Member
Tevo Saks
Yes
Community Member
Nana Safo
No
DRep
Maureen Wepngong
Yes
DRep
David Muzzi
No
Intersect
Discussion Point
Notes
Actions: Responsible / Note
Meeting Time Change
Discussion to move the weekly meeting to Thursdays at 2:00 p.m. UTC to accommodate participant schedules and avoid conflicts with other committee calls.
Members agreed that this time suits most of the people, so from next week, the weekly meeting will be re-scheduled.
Simo Simovic: Schedule the WG weekly meeting on Thursdays at 2:00 p.m. UTC
Action Items Update
Confirmation that Maureen received access to the working group's document folder.
Meeting minutes and recordings are being published on the knowledge base.
Phil created a recommendation document for tracking governance issues and solutions.
Recommendation Tracking Process
Phil presented a proposed process for identifying problems, developing solutions, and submitting recommendations to the ISC using a shared register. Discussion on the workflow and status updates for recommendations.
Suggestion to include a priority field in the register.
Phil Lewis: Add additional columns and update doc sheets per discussion to the recommendation tracking register.
Timeline & Deadlines
Discussion on establishing timelines for addressing governance issues and delivering recommendations, particularly in relation to the October elections. Suggestion to aim for a 15-30 day timeframe for completing recommendations.
Phil Lewis: Add suggestions from discussion in the Guide tab.
Voting Rights in Working Group
Discussion on determining voting members within the working group. Initial agreement to grant voting rights to Phil, Thiago, Nico, Gintama, and potentially others who regularly attend.
Simo Simovic: Finalize the list of voting members for the working group.
Sybil Attack Concerns
Brief mention of addressing Sybil attack risks in the election process; noting that the Intersect elections team is already working on this. Suggestion to collaborate on this matter,with all others, bringing them into the WG discussion.
Committee Collaboration
Emphasis on the importance of improving collaboration and communication between different Intersect committees.
Terence McCutcheon: Continue efforts to facilitate cross-committee collaboration.
Action Item Tracking
Agreement to use the shared register to track action items and their status.
Name
Attendance
Role
Yes
WG Lead/Secretary
Jack Briggs
No
Interim Executive Director
Nick Cook
No
Director - Operations (Interim)
Phil Lewis
No
ISC Member
Thiago Nunes
No
Interim ISC Member
Pedro Lucas
No
OSC Chair, Representing two Enterprise Members
Nicholas Cerny
No
Civics Committee member
Vaibhav S
Yes
GMC Member
Naushad Fouze
Yes
Product Committee
Jose Iadicicco
No
Community Member
Tevo Saks
No
Community Member
Nana Safo
No
DRep
Maureen Wepngong
Yes
DRep
Terence McCutcheon
Yes
Intersect
Discussion Point
Notes
Actions: Responsible / Note
Update from last week
The meeting moved to Thursdays at 2:00 p.m. UTC as all participants agreed. UTC based on previous agreement.
Phil added a priority column (urgent, medium, low) and an "implemented" status to the recommendation register document.
No new recommendations were added to the register since the last meeting.
Election Process Review
Discussion to use the April committee election process as a reference point for improving the October board and committee elections.
Emphasis on providing feedback specifically on aspects of the election process that were not working well.
Working Group Members: Review the "Intersect Committee Election 2025 Process Overview" document and provide feedback on areas for improvement.
Sybil Attack Resistance Concerns
Concerns raised again about sybil attack resistance in elections due to the low cost of membership. Counter-argument that the current membership numbers and voting participation don't statistically support significant civil attacks.
Election Transparency
Suggestion to improve election transparency by providing live voting updates or a dashboard showing candidate progress.
Maureen Wepngong: Add a detailed recommendation for live voting updates to the recommendation register.
Committees Update
ISC Actions/Update from last week
Committee Service Reward
Intersect 2026 plan drafting timeline
ED Process Update
Committee Election Update
AOB & Meeting Close
Name
Attendance
Role
Voting Seat (Y/N)
Yes
Secretary
N
Jack Briggs
Yes
Interim Executive Director
Y
Nick Cook
No
Director - Operations (Interim)
Y
YUTA
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Phil Lewis
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Sheldon Hunt
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Fred Tanaka
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Elaine Cardenas
Yes
OSC Chair
Y
Samuel Leathers
Yes
Product Chair
Y
Darlington Welsh
No
MCC Chair
Y
Kristijan Kowalsky
Yes
CBC Chair
Y
Kevin Hammond
No
TSC Chair
Y
Wes Parkison
Yes
GMC Chair
Y
Nicolas Cerny
Yes
CCC Chair
Y
Christian Taylor
Yes
Head of OSO
N
Lorenzo Bruno
Yes
Head of Product
N
Matt Davis
No
Head of Tech Operation
N
Tim Richmond
No
Head of Comms
N
Lloyd Duhon
Yes
Secretary of Budget Committee
N
Larisa Mcfarlane
No
Secretary of CCC
N
Terence McCutcheon
Yes
Secretary of OSC
N
Rand McHenry - Member of the Board
Mercy - Member of the Board
Kyle Solomon - Vice Chair of Product Committee
Valeria Devaux - Observer
Thiago Nunes - Observer
The meeting opened with a welcome to two newly elected Board members, who joined the ISC call for the first time. They introduced themselves, expressing gratitude for the opportunity and emphasizing their intent to listen, learn, and represent community priorities moving forward.
Civics Committee The Constitutional Amendment Working Group officially launched, with strong participation from contributors across Intersect and the wider community, including representation from the Cardano Foundation legal team. The group will meet weekly to advance governance health metrics and educational initiatives.
Budget Committee A new blog post was published introducing the 2026 Budget Process, accompanied by an open feedback form. The committee has also begun a series of X Spaces and AMAs to collect sentiment from DReps, vendors, and the community, with a dedicated session planned on the Net Change Limit (NCL). The goal is to refine the process through transparent feedback.
GMC (Growth & Marketing Committee) The committee is finalizing analysis of its pre-Rare Evo community survey. Data has been reviewed internally, and a summary report is being prepared for publication next month, followed by a comprehensive white paper by year-end.
Product Committee The committee shared updates from recent workshops across Asia (Singapore, Osaka, and Tokyo). A shared draft vision statement has been developed for the Cardano 2030 Strategy, with additional sessions planned for the Japanese community and ecosystem partners to ensure broader stakeholder representation.
Open Source Committee (OSC) The Developer Advocates Program is operational, with participants preparing onboarding materials for new developers entering Cardano from other ecosystems. All contracts for the first batch of contributors are signed. The committee has also finalized its Q4 events schedule, including participation in the Cardano Summit and the Open Source Summit Japan.
The Committee Reward Policy received full legal approval with two clarifications:
The term “committee member” has been refined to “active committee member,” and both roles (members and chairs) are now clearly defined.
A compliance clause was added requiring submission of IRS Form W-8BEN (non-US) or W-9 (US citizens) before rewards can be processed. These forms must be renewed annually.
Members discussed implementation logistics. It was confirmed that submission will be integrated into the Intersect member portal, with forms required twice in this cycle (covering 2025–2026). The policy is now ready for implementation, with the process to be reviewed once in place.
The Annual Member Meeting (AMM) is planned for late November 2025 and will be hosted virtually in collaboration with the Clay team to maximize global participation.
The Intersect Member Survey has been open for three weeks, with around 30 responses so far.
Results will inform a draft proposal summarizing Intersect’s mission, vision, and strategy, to be shared one week before the AMM for review.
During the AMM, members will discuss and refine the proposal, with a post-event poll confirming the final version.
Applications and nominations for the Executive Director role remain open until Friday, 24 October.
Next week, after an initial screening by the People Lead and Board, sentiment polls will open for both Intersect members and DReps.
The ISC confirmed that three members have volunteered to join the ED Selection Panel, with up to five total nominees to be forwarded to the Board.
The Board will then select two ISC representatives for the panel.
Committee election applications have significantly increased compared to the prior week, with 44 candidates across eight committees.
Open Source (8), Product (8), Growth & Marketing (9), Civics (4), and ISC (4) are well-represented.
The Technical Steering Committee (3) and Budget Committee (1) still have fewer candidates than available seats.
The application deadline is Friday, 24 October at 12:00 UTC. Members were encouraged to share the call for candidates within their networks as the final push.
Members revisited a prior request to organize a special joint session between the ISC, Board, and Executive Team to discuss Intersect’s identity as a Member-Based Organization (MBO) and the evolving role of members. The proposal received general support and will be raised at the upcoming Board meeting.
Proceed with implementation of the Committee reward policy; integrate tax form process into the member portal.
Executive Team to raise with the Board members proposal for joint ISC–Board discussion on MBO structure.
Committees Update
ISC Actions/Update from last week
Committee Service Rewards Review
AOB & Meeting Close
Name
Attendance
Role
Voting Seat (Y/N)
No
Secretary
N
Jack Briggs
Yes
Interim Executive Director
Y
Nick Cook
No
Director - Operations (Interim)
Y
YUTA
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Phil Lewis
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Sheldon Hunt
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Fred Tanaka
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Elaine Cardenas
Yes
OSC Chair
Y
Samuel Leathers
No
Product Chair
Y
Darlington Welsh
Yes
MCC Chair
Y
Kristijan Kowalsky
Yes
CBC Chair
Y
Kevin Hammond
Yes
TSC Chair
Y
Wes Parkison
Yes
GMC Chair
Y
Nicolas Cerny
Yes
CCC Chair
Y
Christian Taylor
No
Head of OSO
N
Lorenzo Bruno
Yes
Head of Product
N
Matt Davis
No
Head of Tech Operation
N
Tim Richmond
No
Head of Comms
N
Duncan Soutar
No
Secretary of TSC
N
Lloyd Duhon
No
Secretary of Budget Committee
N
Larisa Mcfarlane
No
Secretary of CCC
N
Terence McCutcheon
No
Secretary of OSC
N
Tim Harrison - Vice Chair of GMC
Kyle Solomon - Vice Chair of Product Committee
Thiago Nunes - Observer
Technical Steering Committee (TSC) The committee is preparing a less technical explainer document and working on a disaster recovery “fire drill” on SanchoNet to test procedures once a new security incident officer is appointed.
Open Source Committee (OSC) The OSC has finalized forms for the maintainer retainer program and already exceeded the initial target for interested participants. Work continues on interview questions for maintainers and on advancing the developer advocate program, including piloting a model where an advocate reports directly to the OSC.
Membership & Community Committee (MCC) The MCC is focusing on membership and enterprise benefits, holding internal workshops to refine proposals for rollout in the coming days.
Budget Committee The committee is developing the new budget process and has added a second weekly working session to keep up with activities. A report on smart contracts was reviewed, and preparations are underway to present a budget framework to the board by the next meeting.
Civics Committee The committee confirmed that a grant will be pursued to implement CIP-149, enabling ADA holders to donate a percentage of staking rewards directly to DReps. Intersect staff are preparing the proposal. The committee’s working groups will soon appear on the Intersect calendar for easier participation.
A revised draft of the Service Reward Policy was discussed, incorporating prior feedback. The key new element is that members must submit a brief monthly contribution summary in order to collect rewards. This aims to strengthen transparency and accountability while keeping administrative burden low.
Reward Levels: 500 ADA/month for committee members; 1,000 ADA/month for chairs.
Collection Requirement: Rewards are optional but tied to submission of a monthly contribution summary.
Implementation: System to be self-served via the member area; no payout possible without submitting the summary.
Discussion Points:
Some raised concerns that writing reports may create unnecessary burden. Others emphasized that a short, journal-style entry is minimal effort and provides transparency.
Suggestions included limiting entries to a short format (e.g., 500 characters) or having committees issue collective reports rather than individual ones.
Proposals were made to split rewards: half based on attendance, half on contribution, with data tracked via meeting minutes or ClickUp.
Some supported giving committees more autonomy to manage and distribute rewards internally, though concerns were raised about consistency and fairness across committees.
A need for clarity on what “public” means was noted — whether reports are visible to all members or the general public.
There was broad agreement to proceed with a first version of the policy, while continuing to refine implementation details. A vote is expected soon, with the aim to activate the system by late September or early October.
Service Rewards: Update draft policy to reflect feedback (short contribution reports, attendance-based ideas, committee autonomy options). Prepare a clean version for vote in the next meeting.
Meeting Introduction
Intersect Committee Elections - Progress Update
Update from Business Function and Committees (If Any)
AOB & Meeting Close
Name
Attendance
Role
Voting Seat (Y/N)
Yes
Secretary
N
Jack Briggs
No
Director of Ecosystem
Y
Lawrence Clark
No
Head of Operations
Y
Nick Cook
Yes
Head of Membership & Community Hubs
Y
YUTA
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Phil Lewis
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Thiago Nunes
No
Interim Community Member Seat
Y
Pedro Lucas
Yes
OSC Chair
Y
Samuel Leathers
No
Product Chair
Y
Darlington Welsh
Yes
MCC Chair
Y
Prof. Steven
Yes
Chair of Board of Directors and CBC Chair
Y
Kevin Hammond
No
TSC Chair
Y
Seomon
No
GMC Chair
Y
Jose Miguel De Gamboa
Yes
CCC Chair
Y
Christian Taylor
No
Head of OSO
N
Lorenzo Bruno
Yes
Head of Product
N
No
Head of Tech Operation
N
Duncan Soutar
No
Secretary of TSC
N
Lloyd Duhon
Yes
Secretary of Budget Committee
N
Larisa Mcfarlane
No
Secretary of CCC
N
Terence McCutcheon
Yes
Secretary of OSC
N
Additional Attendees:
Adam Ruch - Observer
Gemma Dakin - Observer
The meeting was rescheduled from Monday to Tuesday due to the Easter holiday.
Noted that most executive team members were absent.
MCC outlined its internal process for reviewing budget proposals:
Proposals under 300K ADA will be recommended for submission to Catalyst.
Duplicate hub proposals will be reviewed and potentially merged.
Proposals will be evaluated against MCC’s stated priorities before endorsement.
Clarification is still needed on the practical effect of MCC endorsements.
A question was raised about how DRep temperature checks (yes/no votes) should influence proposal progression.
The need for clear parameters around the impact of DRep feedback on moving proposals to reconciliation workshops was discussed.
A suggestion was made to invite workshop organizers to clarify this process in a future session.
Concerns were raised about slow or absent communication from Intersect executive team, particularly on Discord and regarding budget process documentation and member voting.
A proposal was made to track open questions and outstanding items more formally.
The Open Source Committee (OSC) reported a unanimous decision not to review proposals submitted directly by vendors.
Proposers are encouraged to use the existing OSC frameworks, such as the contribution ladder or project incubation.
OSC members will triage submissions and suggest alternate pathways where appropriate.
The Constitutional Council (CC) plans to vote against the Intersect-submitted net change limit info action due to an error in epoch calculations.
This is viewed as a quality control issue but is unlikely to have a practical effect, as the DReps and other CC members have already approved the limit.
It was suggested that future limits be treated as parameter updates rather than info actions.
Ongoing issues were raised with the UI/UX of the Gov Tool, including mobile connectivity problems, which are limiting user engagement.
Updates were shared regarding development efforts and funding constraints.
Suggestions included organizing developer workshops and integrating links to community-built tools within the interface.
The importance of engaging individual ADA holders (not just large stakeholders) in voting was emphasized.
The group discussed exploring new mechanisms to encourage broader participation in governance.
Potential overlaps between MCC’s hub initiatives and those of the Growth & Marketing Committee (GMC) were flagged.
A request was made for ISC to provide stronger coordination between committees to avoid duplicative efforts.
Action: ISC Secretary to compile a list of open items and unanswered questions.
Action: ISC to review and monitor progress on these items in future meetings.
Action: ISC to facilitate a discussion between MCC and GMC to align on community initiatives.
Committees Update
ISC Actions/Update from last week
New Updates Section Demo
AOB & Meeting Close
Additional Attendees:
Kyle Solomon - Vice-chair of Product Committee
Elaine Cardenas - Vice-chair of OSC
Thiago Nunes - Observer
Technical Steering Committee (TSC) plans to publish updated evaluation criteria to help DReps assess 39 TW proposals. Feedback was also provided on the first draft of the 2030 Vision. The TSC emphasized the need for principle-based direction and proposed a working session to support the Product Committee’s next iteration.
Civics Committee presented its roadmap for the remainder of 2025, focusing on:
Defining governance health metrics through a requirements document and running a pilot RFP for builder engagement.
Developing a framework for evergreen governance education content. The approach aims to open participation and avoid direct funding-only routes.
Budget Committee announced a retro survey to gather feedback from Intersect members and the wider community, with a focus on leveraging Rare Evo week for open dialogue.
Growth & Marketing Committee (GMC) finalizing a governance poll to launch shortly. Social media efforts are ramping up, with plans to highlight committee updates. Committees will be contacted via chairs for regular contributions to public communications.
Open Source Committee finalizing developer advocate selections and budget milestone planning.
Product Committee acknowledged concerns with the early 2030 Vision draft. A major revision process is underway, incorporating community and committee input. The committee is balancing the interests of speculative users with adoption-focused stakeholders.
Decision-Making Framework: WG is still working on the refinement.
Treasury Withdrawals: All 39 actions are live on-chain. Contracts are close to being signed, and Intersect is preparing to activate funding upon proposal ratification. Concerns were raised about the lack of visible milestones for community evaluation. The need for flexibility, transparency, and possible feedback loops (e.g., from DReps) was acknowledged. Oversight committees and dashboards will support ongoing monitoring.
Intersect Role & Identity: ISC feedback was summarized in a document shared with the Executive team. The document will help shape Intersect’s future direction and may inform discussions at Rare Evo. A member survey is being considered to capture broader sentiment.
Board Election Questions: Final draft completed and shared for board review. ISC members were encouraged to provide final comments. The action is marked as complete.
Dismissal Policy: Confirmed to be in effect. First dismissals may occur in September. Follow-up tracking will be maintained at the committee level. The action is marked as complete.
A new feature was demoed, allowing staff and committee secretaries to publish short updates in the member portal. Users can opt-in to receive these via email (weekly/monthly) and filter by topic. This system is part of a transition away from the current dev report process, improving accessibility and content traceability. Suggestions were made to add member profile pages and ensure accuracy in public-facing updates. These are under development.
Next Steps & Action Items
Follow up with the board regarding regular participation in ISC meetings
Committees Update
ISC Actions/Update from last week
Board Election/ Recommendation from the Intersect Governance WG
Committee Funding after TW
AOB & Meeting Close
Additional Attendees:
Kyle Solomon - Observer
Thiago Nunes - Observer
The meeting opened with updates from the various committees, following a new agenda structure where committee updates are prioritized to facilitate cross-committee collaboration.
Civics Committee is developing OKRs for 2025 through a series of workshops. They launched a dedicated X (Twitter) account and are exploring best practices for content access and hosting Spaces. The committee will define social media access guidelines, emphasizing security and appropriate delegation of responsibilities.
Budget Committee is engaged in:
A cleanup and revision of internal documentation and charters, to be submitted to the board for approval.
A retrospective analysis of the 2025 budget process to inform the 2026 cycle. The committee aims for broad stakeholder engagement through surveys, workshops, and outreach, involving both on-chain actors and off-chain contributors.
Members emphasized the importance of updating only internal process elements, not the broader governance structure.
Technical Steering Committee (TSC) shared updates on several initiatives:
Coordination with the Product and Growth Committees to align remits and priorities.
Plans to broaden the Hydra working group into a Layer 2-focused group.
A proposal to increase Plutus memory limits is underway, pending the constitutionally required three-month notice period.
A potential intra-era hard fork is being evaluated, with discussions to begin in 2–3 months after development matures.
Membership and Community Committee (MCC) is onboarding new members and exploring a credentials working group tied to membership verification and the portal. Further coordination with Intersect support is being planned.
Product Committee is continuing work on the 2030 vision, collecting feedback from founding entities and node teams. A draft vision template has been created to formalize insights. Committee members emphasized that the visioning process is ongoing and iterative.
Open Source Committee (OSC) has launched new developer advocate applications and is refining its maintainer retainer program. A key concern raised was defining the scope and depth of oversight over funded proposals, especially regarding technical assessments.
A decision-making framework proposal will be reviewed and discussed in the Governance WG before being brought back to the ISC.
A consultant transition plan has been finalized and will be presented to the board on Thursday.
ISC members were invited to present updates to the board. Two members volunteered and will participate during the dedicated 15-20 minute board session.
Updates were shared regarding the readiness to submit 39 individual treasury withdrawal actions:
Smart contract testing on mainnet has been completed.
Metadata templates for each withdrawal are being prepared.
A clarification was provided on the role of "info actions" in the constitution. Although not strictly required, an info action summarizing the withdrawal plan may still be submitted for transparency.
There was alignment that the withdrawals should reference the approved budget action and include validation steps to ensure fund recipients match approved entities.
Submission is tentatively scheduled for epoch 567 (early next week), pending board approval on Wednesday.
A communication plan will be developed and coordinated with the Budget Committee post-board approval.
The Governance WG presented a recommendation for the upcoming board election:
Suggests restricting voting to members who have held membership for at least 3 months prior to the election.
Give one or more options for anyone that joined after the cut-off to be verified (ex. Proof of Life, identity verification etc.)
Emphasized risks related to vote-buying and the need for minimal friction to retain voter participation.
The proposal received broad support from ISC members and will be presented to the board on Thursday.
A discussion on 2025 committee funding after treasury withdrawal was deferred to the next meeting due to time constraints.
Governance WG to continue refining the decision-making framework.
ISC representatives to participate in Thursday’s board meeting to present key updates and priorities from the respective committee.
`intersect Governance WG’s election recommendation to be formally reviewed by the board this week.
Committee funding topic to be added to the next ISC agenda.
Committees Update
ISC Actions/Update from last week
ISC Survey (Intersect Role & Identity)
Committee Stipend
AOB & Meeting Close
Elaine Cardenas - Vice Chair of OSC
Adam Rusch - Board Member
Kyle Solomon - Vice Chair of Product Committee
Tim Harrison - Vice Chair of GMC
Thiago Nunes - Observer
The Budget Committee announced that 37 of 39 proposals were successfully ratified, securing funding for Cardano in 2025. They are running a retrospective survey but participation remains low, with only seven responses submitted so far, and members were strongly encouraged to promote it more widely. Work has also begun on signing smart contracts for milestone zero payments, with an emphasis on ensuring that smaller vendors, who are more reliant on immediate funds, are prioritized.
Technical Steering Committee (TSC) reported that they have reviewed Phil’s proposed survey and provided feedback on the Cardano 2030 Vision. They stressed that the vision should be seen as Cardano-wide rather than product-specific, and they identified gaps between the stated goals and the mechanisms for achieving them. The committee sees value in focusing on developing concrete implementation pathways.
Growth & Marketing Committee (GMC) shared that their survey has gathered around 67 responses so far, with a target of 150–200. They highlighted positive outcomes from Rare Evo and DevOnGov Day, and noted several successful funding outcomes, including the Product Committee’s workshop series, global events such as the Argentina summit, and the Builder DAO initiative. Looking ahead, the committee will prioritize finalizing a three-month plan with clear priorities and a timeline that can be publicly shared.
The Product Committee reported that their workshop in Las Vegas was a success and that their broader workshop series received strong community support and funding. They are continuing to collect and integrate feedback to refine Cardano’s vision and strategy, and announced a remote workshop scheduled for later in the week as part of the ongoing series.
Civics Committee confirmed that it has recommended Intersect pursue grants to wallet providers for the implementation of CIP-149, which would enable ADA holders to direct a percentage of their staking rewards to DReps.
The Executive Team reported that paper-based contracts have been issued, and smart contract deployment will begin shortly. Members were urged to sign contracts within 36 hours of issuance. In parallel, the executive is preparing a strategy for the remainder of 2025, including resource planning, which will be presented to the board at its next meeting.
The Governance Working Group is finalizing the decision-making framework, including a process diagram and supporting documentation, which will be presented to the ISC within the next two weeks. Other items still in progress include the committee stipend policy, the ISC survey, and clarifying funding for committees that were not successful in the budget process.
Phil Lewis presented a proposal for an ISC survey aimed at capturing member feedback in a concise format. Members discussed timing, with agreement that launching in September before the AMM would be optimal. Suggestions included keeping the survey open through October so that results can feed into the AMM discussions and be published in time for the AMM.
A motion was raised by Kevin Hammond for approval in principle for the survey, seconded by Phil Lewis. The motion passed with 12 voting members in favor and one voting member absent. Simo and Phil will now refine the survey wording with input from the executive team and present a final version before publishing.
The committee revisited the stipend policy originally decided in November 2024, which set payments at 500 ADA/month for members and 1,000 ADA/month for chairs, subject to annual review and not backdated. Confusion remains over the start date, with some members under the impression stipends would begin in January 2025, while the approved treasury withdrawal aligns funding from June 2025 through June 2026.
Discussion points included:
Chairs should not receive dual stipends for ISC duties, as this is part of their role.
Members serving on multiple committees should be eligible for stipends from each.
A performance-based stipend component was not recommended, as existing mechanisms already address participation issues.
Retroactive payments before June would require board or executive approval, as ISC cannot commit funds directly.
There was general agreement that stipends should begin from June 2025, tied to the DRep-approved treasury withdrawal. Simo will prepare a consolidated one-page document capturing stipend decisions and details for ISC review.
Simo and Phil to finalize the draft of survey with executive input, targeting September launch.
Simo to prepare a summary document on stipend policy for ISC review.
Simo to find the meeting (Feb/March) where committee stipend were discussed. (Requested by Lucas)
ISC Actions/Update from last week
Legal/contract admin process update from Workshop
Update from Committees and Business Functions (If Any)
AOB & Meeting Close
Thiago Nunes - Observer
The meeting began with a review of open actions from the ISC ClickUp board. Updates included:
Decision-Making Framework: A proposal is in development by Intersect staff and will be presented at the next ISC meeting.
Consultant Transition Plan: A final version is being prepared and will be presented to the board at the end of June. The rollout is set to begin in July.
Monthly AMA Sessions: The first session is expected to take place at the end of June; scheduling is still pending.
Chair Elections and Voting Tool: The polling tool was used successfully by at least one committee (Civics and Budget), with others finalizing elections shortly. No significant issues were reported, and the onboarding action will be closed.
Knowledge Base Update Tracking: A new page showing recently updated documentation has been added to the knowledge base. The action item is closed.
ISC Participation at Board Meeting: ISC representatives will attend the next board meeting in June to strengthen communication and collaboration.
A detailed update was provided on the outcomes of the legal and administrative workshop held in Valencia. Key points included:
Purpose: The workshop addressed alignment between Intersect’s founding documentation, vendor contracts, and the use of smart contracts in treasury withdrawals.
Participants: Included internal and external legal counsel, constitutional experts, and tax advisors.
Outcomes: A comprehensive set of artifacts, updates, and policies is being developed. These include:
Updates to master service agreements and vendor contracts.
Smart contract documentation and oversight procedures.
Drafts of governance and compliance policies (e.g., technical review, due diligence, financial audits).
A forthcoming transparency framework outlining how multiple governance layers collectively ensure accountability.
All deliverables are being tracked internally and most are in advanced draft stages. The intent is to share drafts for community review in the coming weeks and ensure all documents are living and regularly updated.
An update was provided on the live community poll regarding treasury withdrawal strategy. Initial results showed a strong preference for submitting all 39 funded proposals individually rather than bundling them. While this approach is operationally complex, Intersect is working on how to support it. Plans include:
Metadata Standardization: To ensure clarity and consistency across submissions.
Staggered Submission: Withdrawals may be submitted gradually over several weeks to manage internal workload.
Coordination with Vendors: Additional support and verification will be required to ensure correct wallet addresses and compliance with constitutional requirements.
The need for clearly marked, verifiable treasury actions was discussed to help voters easily identify official submissions. Solutions such as publishing the signing public key and using a designated submission wallet are being explored.
The ISC discussed how to prioritize the sequence of individual treasury withdrawal actions. Ideas included:
Ranking based on proposal popularity (number of votes).
Prioritizing time-sensitive needs (e.g. events like Cardano Summit).
Exploring contributions from ISC or committees to help with coordination and workload distribution.
The Budget Committee has already started working on a prioritization approach and will continue refining it over the week.
Present draft of the decision-making framework at the next ISC meeting.
Committees Update
ISC Actions/Update from last week
Discuss Intersect future role in the budget process
Continue discussion on Milestone review cycle for the 39 proposals
AOB & Meeting Close
Additional Attendees:
Kyle Solomon - Voting on behalf of Sam Leathers
Thiago Nunes - Observer
Open Source Committee: The developer advocate program is being restructured. A second round will be launched with updated messaging to attract higher-quality applicants and improve internal evaluation processes.
Product Committee: Shared insights from a feedback session with “F.” and highlighted a recent productive meeting with an external group. Discussions with IO and Emurgo are planned to mirror this exchange.
Budget Committee: Continued retrospective discussions and received updates on the upcoming treasury withdrawal. A new metadata review step will be implemented for added oversight. Issues with international bank transfers (especially for large Catalyst payments) were discussed—Intersect may need to coordinate with banking partners to prevent payment delays.
Civics Committee: OKRs and initiatives have been finalized; a formal plan will be presented next week.
The metadata for the 39 treasury withdrawal proposals is nearly complete. Minor adjustments are being made due to vendor changes. Aiming for submission within the week. Tim Richmond is coordinating communications and support to vendors post-submission, including a vendor pitch event and social media kits.
Anticipation that many treasury withdrawal proposals may not pass, which could affect ecosystem morale.
Intersect will remain neutral in voting outcomes but will offer logistical and communication support to vendors (e.g. symposiums, social sharing).
Proposals can be resubmitted, and feedback loops are planned.
A wide-ranging discussion on Intersect’s strategic scope:
Should Intersect continue acting as a broad facilitator of budget proposals for the ecosystem or narrow its focus?
Differing views on whether Intersect should continue playing this expansive role or specialize (e.g., in delivery assurance, technical oversight).
Lloyd suggested member-first engagement in surveys before broader community outreach.
Phil argued that being a budget administrator doesn’t necessarily require an MBO structure—Intersect needs to clarify its value proposition.
Kevin emphasized Catalyst’s limitations in supporting core technical development; Intersect fills that gap.
Kyle and Pedro agreed Intersect needs to scale back, focusing on strengths rather than trying to do everything.
Darlington called for a broader strategic reflection on Intersect’s identity and purpose beyond the current agenda cycle.
Sheldon highlighted growing internal fatigue and bureaucracy, advocating for urgency, focus, and improved communications.
Treasury Withdrawals:
Final metadata checks and submission expected this week.
Internal and on-chain tests ongoing; proposal batch will be submitted as one transaction.
Communications plan to be executed post-submission (vendor symposium, social toolkits, etc.).
A sentiment analysis may be explored to understand proposal rejection reasoning.
Intersect Strategic Direction:
ISC to synthesize feedback from today’s discussion.
A broader organizational workshop may be needed to reassess Intersect’s purpose, focus, and operating model ahead of the 2026 cycle.
Budget Committee:
Continue retrospective and internal survey drafting.
Explore structuring input collection to prioritize members before the general community.
Civics Committee:
Present finalized OKRs and plan at next ISC meeting.
Meeting Introduction
ISC/Board Discussion
Intersect Committee Elections - Progress Update
AOB & Meeting Close
Additional Attendees:
Adam Rush - Board Member
Gerard Moroney - Board Member
Kavinda Kariyapperuma - Board Member
Valeria Devaux - Observer
The meeting opened with a welcome and an overview of recent events. There was a focus on addressing member’s feedback and concerns following a recent petition and subsequent discussions.
The board was present in an open “Ask Me Anything” format to listen to members' feedback.
An update was provided on the strong response in committee applications and the extension of the election deadline to allow further participation.
Concerns were raised over the process for recent changes, with emphasis on how feedback was gathered and acted upon.
There was a call for clear communication and thorough documentation that compares previous approaches with the new processes.
Participants stressed the importance of balancing legitimacy between Intersect members and DReps.
Issues regarding committee participation were discussed, including low application rates for certain committees and concerns over back pay for committee members.
The meeting highlighted a need for better coordination between overlapping responsibilities of different committees to streamline efforts and improve accountability.
Proposals were made for capturing and documenting internal governance processes through an ongoing working group.
The idea of creating visual infographics alongside detailed written documentation was suggested to make the new process accessible and transparent.
There was discussion on improving internal accountability and clarifying roles and responsibilities within the organization.
The board committed to providing a written response outlining immediate next steps and potential tactical changes by the end of the week.
The internal governance WG will work on producing comprehensive documentation comparing old and new processes.
The board will continue engaging with various committees through regular sessions to maintain open channels of communication.
The meeting concluded with a shared commitment to improving governance, documentation, and communication.
The board reaffirmed members that their input is valued, and a follow-up action plan will be provided.
Participants were thanked for their candid contributions and active engagement in the discussion.
Committees Update
ISC Actions/Update from last week
Committee Service Rewards Review
AOB & Meeting Close
Adam Rusch - Intersect Board Member
Kyle Solomon - Vice Chair of Product Committee
Thiago Nunes - Observer
Open Source Committee (OSC) The committee confirmed that developer advocates have been selected and are now onboarding. Work is also progressing on the maintainer retainer program, with interview guidelines currently being finalized.
Civics Committee The committee reported that the Governance Health Working Group held its first meeting. Calls for applications for both the Governance Health WG and the Education WG have been published via the newsletter.
Decision-Making Framework: The Governance WG is finalizing a decision-making diagram and supporting documentation. A draft has been shared, and the goal is to present a finalized version back to ISC at an upcoming meeting.
Committee Funding: Still an open issue. The internal team will need to develop a mechanism for supporting committees not covered in the approved budget.
3. Committee Service Reward Policy Discussion
The committee debated the proposed Service Reward Policy, with wide-ranging perspectives:
Concerns Raised:
Risk of rewarding inactive members simply for being elected.
Potential for reputational harm if Intersect is seen as paying “free money.”
Suggestion to focus rewards on active contributors, potentially through peer assessment, self-reporting, or committee-level decisions.
Alternative Approaches:
Flat, simple rewards for all elected members, with strict use of the dismissal policy to remove non-contributors.
Additional incentives for outstanding contributors, possibly tied to visibility in elections.
Requiring members to log monthly contributions as a condition for claiming rewards.
Shifting rewards to end-of-term disbursement to simplify administration and avoid paying those dismissed mid-term.
Board Input: The board reiterated its expectation that committee members should be compensated for their service, while encouraging ISC to balance fairness, simplicity, and accountability. A recommendation is expected soon, ideally before the next committee elections.
Next Steps: The draft will be refined further, incorporating suggestions and clarifying decision-making authority. ISC members were asked to consult their committees and return with positions to enable a vote next week.
The board application process has opened and will run for two weeks. Updated requirements now include at least six months of membership to participate in elections. Members can complete verification via KYC or decentralized ID. Applications will be visible in the member area as they are submitted.
The draft ISC survey has been shared with members for feedback. The plan is to finalize it next week, launch by 10–12 September, keep it open for 6–8 weeks, and publish results for the November AMM.
Service Reward Policy: Refine the policy, make it final. Chairs to discuss with committees; ISC to vote on a final version next week.
Name
Attendance
Role
Voting Seat (Y/N)
Yes
Secretary
N
Jack Briggs
Yes
Interim Executive Director
Y
Nick Cook
No
Director - Operations (Interim)
Y
YUTA
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Phil Lewis
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Sheldon Hunt
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Fred Tanaka
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Pedro Lucas
Yes
OSC Chair
Y
Samuel Leathers
No
Product Chair
Y
Darlington Welsh
Yes
MCC Chair
Y
Kristijan Kowalsky
Yes
CBC Chair
Y
Kevin Hammond
Yes
TSC Chair
Y
Wes Parkison
Yes
GMC Chair
Y
Nicolas Cerny
Yes
Interim CCC Chair
Y
Christian Taylor
Yes
Head of OSO
N
Lorenzo Bruno
Yes
Head of Product
N
Matt Davis
No
Head of Tech Operation
N
Tim Richmond
Yes
Head of Comms
N
Duncan Soutar
Yes
Secretary of TSC
N
Lloyd Duhon
Yes
Secretary of Budget Committee
N
Larisa Mcfarlane
No
Secretary of CCC
N
Terence McCutcheon
Yes
Secretary of OSC
N
Name
Attendance
Role
Voting Seat (Y/N)
Yes
Secretary
N
Jack Briggs
Yes
Interim Executive Director
Y
Nick Cook
No
Director - Operations (Interim)
Y
YUTA
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Phil Lewis
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Sheldon Hunt
No
Community Member Seat
Y
Fred Tanaka
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Pedro Lucas
Yes
OSC Chair
Y
Samuel Leathers
No
Product Chair
Y
Darlington Welsh
Yes
MCC Chair
Y
Kristijan Kowalsky
Yes
CBC Chair
Y
Kevin Hammond
Yes
TSC Chair
Y
Wes Parkison
No
GMC Chair
Y
Nicolas Cerny
Yes
Interim CCC Chair
Y
Christian Taylor
No
Head of OSO
N
Lorenzo Bruno
Yes
Head of Product
N
Matt Davis
No
Head of Tech Operation
N
Duncan Soutar
Yes
Secretary of TSC
N
Lloyd Duhon
Yes
Secretary of Budget Committee
N
Larisa Mcfarlane
Yes
Secretary of CCC
N
Terence McCutcheon
No
Secretary of OSC
N
Name
Attendance
Role
Voting Seat (Y/N)
Yes
Secretary
N
Jack Briggs
No
Interim Executive Director
Y
Nick Cook
Yes
Director - Operations (Interim)
Y
YUTA
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Phil Lewis
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Sheldon Hunt
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Fred Tanaka
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Pedro Lucas
Yes
OSC Chair
Y
Samuel Leathers
Yes
Product Chair
Y
Darlington Welsh
Yes
MCC Chair
Y
Kristijan Kowalsky
Yes
CBC Chair
Y
Kevin Hammond
Yes
TSC Chair
Y
Wes Parkison
Yes
GMC Chair
Y
Nicolas Cerny
Yes
CCC Chair
Y
Christian Taylor
Yes
Head of OSO
N
Lorenzo Bruno
Yes
Head of Product
N
Matt Davis
No
Head of Tech Operation
N
Tim Richmond
No
Head of Comms
N
Duncan Soutar
No
Secretary of TSC
N
Lloyd Duhon
Yes
Secretary of Budget Committee
N
Larisa Mcfarlane
Yes
Secretary of CCC
N
Terence McCutcheon
No
Secretary of OSC
N
Name
Attendance
Role
Voting Seat (Y/N)
Yes
Secretary
N
Jack Briggs
Yes
Interim Executive Director
Y
Nick Cook
No
Director - Operations (Interim)
Y
YUTA
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Phil Lewis
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Sheldon Hunt
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Fred Tanaka
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Pedro Lucas
Yes
OSC Chair
Y
Samuel Leathers
Yes
Product Chair
Y
Darlington Welsh
Yes
MCC Chair
Y
TBD
No
CBC Chair
Y
Kevin Hammond
Yes
TSC Chair
Y
Simon Fleck
Yes
Interim GMC Chair
Y
Nicolas Cerny
No
Interim CCC Chair
Y
Christian Taylor
Yes
Head of OSO
N
Lorenzo Bruno
Yes
Head of Product
N
Matt Davis
Yes
Head of Tech Operation
N
Duncan Soutar
Yes
Secretary of TSC
N
Lloyd Duhon
Yes
Secretary of Budget Committee
N
Larisa Mcfarlane
Yes
Secretary of CCC
N
Terence McCutcheon
Yes
Secretary of OSC
N
No
Secretary
N
Jack Briggs
No
Interim Executive Director
Y
Nick Cook
No
Director - Operations (Interim)
Y
YUTA
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Phil Lewis
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Sheldon Hunt
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Fred Tanaka
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Pedro Lucas
Yes
OSC Chair
Y
Samuel Leathers
No
Product Chair
Y
Darlington Welsh
Yes
MCC Chair
Y
Kristijan Kowalsky
Yes
CBC Chair
Y
Kevin Hammond
Yes
TSC Chair
Y
Wes Parkison
No
GMC Chair
Y
Nicolas Cerny
Yes
Interim CCC Chair
Y
Christian Taylor
No
Head of OSO
N
Lorenzo Bruno
Yes
Head of Product
N
Matt Davis
Yes
Head of Tech Operation
N
Duncan Soutar
Yes
Secretary of TSC
N
Lloyd Duhon
Yes
Secretary of Budget Committee
N
Larisa Mcfarlane
No
Secretary of CCC
N
Terence McCutcheon
No
Secretary of OSC
N
Name
Attendance
Role
Voting Seat (Y/N)
Yes
Secretary
N
Jack Briggs
Yes
Director of Ecosystem
Y
Lawrence Clark
Yes
Head of Operations
Y
Nick Cook
Yes
Head of Membership & Community Hubs
Y
YUTA
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Phil Lewis
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Thiago Nunes
No
Interim Community Member Seat
Y
Pedro Lucas
Yes
OSC Chair
Y
Samuel Leathers
Yes
Product Chair
Y
Darlington Welsh
Yes
MCC Chair
Y
Prof. Steven
Yes
Chair of Board of Directors and CBC Chair
Y
Kevin Hammond
No
TSC Chair
Y
Seomon
Yes
GMC Chair
Y
Jose Miguel De Gamboa
Yes
CCC Chair
Y
Christian Taylor
Yes
Head of OSO
N
Lorenzo Bruno
Yes
Head of Product
N
Yes
Head of Tech Operation
N
Duncan Soutar
Yes
Secretary of TSC
N
Lloyd Duhon
Yes
Secretary of Budget Committee
N
Larisa Mcfarlane
Yes
Secretary of CCC
N
Terence McCutcheon
Yes
Secretary of OSC
N
Name
Attendance
Role
Voting Seat (Y/N)
Yes
Secretary
N
Jack Briggs
No
Interim Executive Director
Y
Nick Cook
Yes
Director - Operations (Interim)
Y
YUTA
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Phil Lewis
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Sheldon Hunt
No
Community Member Seat
Y
Fred Tanaka
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Elaine Cardenas
Yes
OSC Chair
Y
Samuel Leathers
No
Product Chair
Y
Darlington Welsh
Yes
MCC Chair
Y
Kristijan Kowalsky
No
CBC Chair
Y
Kevin Hammond
No
TSC Chair
Y
Wes Parkison
No
GMC Chair
Y
Nicolas Cerny
Yes
CCC Chair
Y
Christian Taylor
Yes
Head of OSO
N
Lorenzo Bruno
Yes
Head of Product
N
Matt Davis
No
Head of Tech Operation
N
Tim Richmond
No
Head of Comms
N
Duncan Soutar
No
Secretary of TSC
N
Lloyd Duhon
No
Secretary of Budget Committee
N
Larisa Mcfarlane
Yes
Secretary of CCC
N
Terence McCutcheon
Yes
Secretary of OSC
N
Committees Update
CC Election Update
Committee Election Update
Committee Reward Policy - Implementation Update
AMM Update
AOB & Meeting Close
Name
Attendance
Role
Voting Seat (Y/N)
No
Secretary
N
Jack Briggs
No
Interim Executive Director
Y
Nick Cook
No
Director - Operations (Interim)
Y
YUTA
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Phil Lewis
No
Community Member Seat
Y
Sheldon Hunt
No
Community Member Seat
Y
Fred Tanaka
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Elaine Cardenas
Yes
OSC Chair
Y
Samuel Leathers
Yes
Product Chair
Y
Darlington Welsh
Yes
MCC Chair
Y
Kristijan Kowalsky
No
CBC Chair
Y
Kevin Hammond
No
TSC Chair
Y
Wes Parkison
No
GMC Chair
Y
Nicolas Cerny
No
CCC Chair
Y
Christian Taylor
No
Head of OSO
N
Lorenzo Bruno
Yes
Head of Product
N
Matt Davis
No
Head of Tech Operation
N
Tim Richmond
No
Head of Comms
N
Lloyd Duhon
No
Secretary of Budget Committee
N
Larisa Mcfarlane
Yes
Secretary of CCC
N
Terence McCutcheon
No
Secretary of OSC
N
Megan Hess - Vice chair of OSC
Kyle Solomon - Vice chair of Product Committee
The Product Committee reported that the Cardano 2030 Vision & Strategy is nearing finalization:
Recent in-person workshop at Cardano Summit successfully covered the full draft for the first time.
Additional workshops held across Argentina with positive results.
Community support appears strong, with a straw poll indicating ~⅔ of participants would support the proposal in its current form if submitted on-chain.
Final polishing expected within two weeks, with potential publication in December — though the committee proposes waiting until mid-December for the on-chain vote to avoid holiday-period voter drop-off.
Additional workshops planned in London and Uganda.
A snap election for the Constitutional Committee is now underway due to unexpected resignation announcements:
Triggered by the current council stepping down on 25 November.
A one-week nomination window, followed by one-week campaigning and one-week voting.
Several candidate groups are already preparing to participate, expected to ensure a competitive election.
Blog post, FAQs, and Knowledge Base materials have been published; ISC is encouraged to share information.
Results of the October committee elections have been published:
~300 members voted — considered strong participation.
Overlap period planned to support onboarding of new members, ensuring continuity and knowledge transfer.
The ISC reviewed a demo of the new reward-claim process integrated into the Intersect member dashboard:
Members will view eligible committee months and claim via portal
Single consolidated claim planned for rewards accrued to date (prior to year-end)
Future monthly claiming tied to wallet verification and short contribution summary (for partial claims)
Pilot testing with ISC members expected soon
Annual Intersect Member Meeting happening on Saturday, 29 November — 24-hour global virtual event hosted in partnership with PlayNation.
Regional in-person gatherings leading up to the event (London, Sri Lanka, Kenya, Japan, North America).
AMM Survey remains open until Friday — 71 responses submitted so far.
Data will inform the updated strategy & priorities presented at the AMM
No new formal actions were assigned during this meeting.
Name
Attendance
Role
Yes
WG Lead/Secretary
Phil Lewis
Yes
ISC Member
Thiago Nunes
No
Interim ISC Member
Pedro Lucas
No
OSC Chair, Representing two Enterprise Members
Nicholas Cerny
Yes
Civics Committee Chair
Vaibhav S
Yes
GMC Member
Naushad Fouze
No
Product Committee
Jose Iadicicco
No
Community Member
Maureen Wepngong
Yes
DRep
Terence McCutcheon
Yes
Intersect
Tevo Saks
No
Community Member
Lorenzo Bruno
Yes
Head of Product Curation at Intersect
Discussion Point
Notes
Actions: Responsible / Note
Meeting Cadence
The working group members agreed to switch from a weekly to a fortnightly meeting schedule, as many major topics have been covered. This will give members more time to work on tasks between calls. The cadence can be changed back to weekly if needed.
Simo Simovic: Schedule the next meeting for two weeks from today (August 28).
Decision-Making Process Diagram
The group reviewed a new version of the BPMN (Business Process Model and Notation) diagram for Intersect's decision-making process. The updated diagram separates the roles of working groups and committees and ends the process once a decision is made, rather than including the execution phase. Discussion points focused on the need for a supplementary document to define different levels of decisions (e.g., low, mid, high impact) and to clarify the responsibilities of various bodies. Participants stressed the importance of documenting past decisions to test the process and make it more relatable.
Simo Simovic & Lorenzo Bruno: Finalize the diagram and create a supplementary document that explains the process, including SLAs (Service Level Agreements), and incorporates examples of past decisions.
Accountability & Governance
The conversation touched on the accountability of different Intersect bodies. It was noted that working groups are composed of volunteers, raising questions about their authority and accountability. The working group's charter states that they make recommendations, not final decisions. It was agreed that committees are ultimately responsible for decisions, and this should be clearly reflected in the process. The question of who holds the Board of Council accountable was raised, with one member suggesting that, legally, the members hold this power.
All Members: Provide feedback on the new document once it is shared to ensure clear lines of accountability and responsibility are defined.
Committees Update
ISC Actions/Update from last week
ISC Survey (Intersect Role & Identity)
Committee Stipend
AOB & Meeting Close
Elaine Cardenas - Vice-Chair of OSC
Thiago Nunes - Observer
Technical Steering Committee reported progress on the proposal to increase memory unit limits for Plutus scripts. Updates have been posted on the Cardano Forum and Twitter, with a formal governance announcement planned. As per requirements, a three-month notice period is being observed, aiming for an October submission. Additionally, the committee is planning a fire drill to test disaster recovery mechanisms from CIP-135. This will be conducted on a testnet, not mainnet.
Open Source Committee: Developer advocate recruitment is progressing, with funding in place. Work continues on greenfield initiatives and internal reorganization.
Membership and Community Committee: Work is ongoing on an updated committee charter, currently under asynchronous vote, with the intention to share it more widely once approved. A proposal for new membership benefits is also being developed.
Decision-Making Framework: Final review is underway for the BPMN diagram outlining the process. Once finalized within the WG, it will be presented to the ISC.
Committee Funding for Unfunded Groups: Still pending; expected to be addressed by the Intersect team in mid-August. Intersect and open source committee treasury withdrawal are ratified; awaiting product committee budget approval.
A survey to all Intersect members has been proposed to gather views on the organization’s role and scope. Review is ongoing, with more feedback requested before a decision to proceed.
Broader discussion took place on whether to introduce an “executive function” in governance, with differing perspectives:
Some view early on-chain approval of working group charters as a way to enhance legitimacy.
Others prefer to avoid pre-approval, instead seeking validation after a plan is created.
It was noted that delegated authority already exists in certain processes, and that the membership ultimately defines the organization’s function.
Potential for greater integration or consultation with DReps was also discussed.
November 2024 ISC decision: 500 ADA/month for general members, 1,000 ADA/month for chairs, starting Jan 2025 (no backdating).
Open questions:
Start date (January 2025 vs June 2025, tied to treasury withdrawal approval).
Whether ISC-only members (not in other committees) should receive stipends.
Need for executive team input to clarify overlaps in funding sources.
An alternative stipend allocation model will be discussed in the next meeting
Positive feedback and new enterprise members joined.
NFT releases are tied to the event and membership.
Product Committee workshop on vision—plans for broader committee engagement.
Networking with other ecosystems (Solana, Algorand) could create future collaboration opportunities.
ISC Survey: Circulate the draft in the ISC Discord, encourage comments before the next meeting (Aug 18).
Simo to engage the executive team for clarity on funding overlaps and start date for the committee stipend.
Name
Attendance
Role
Voting Seat (Y/N)
Yes
Secretary
N
Jack Briggs
No
Interim Executive Director
Y
Nick Cook
No
Director - Operations (Interim)
Y
YUTA
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Phil Lewis
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Sheldon Hunt
No
Community Member Seat
Y
Fred Tanaka
No
Community Member Seat
Y
Pedro Lucas
No
OSC Chair
Y
Samuel Leathers
No
Product Chair
Y
Darlington Welsh
Yes
MCC Chair
Y
Kristijan Kowalsky
No
CBC Chair
Y
Kevin Hammond
Yes
TSC Chair
Y
Wes Parkison
No
GMC Chair
Y
Nicolas Cerny
No
CCC Chair
Y
Christian Taylor
Yes
Head of OSO
N
Lorenzo Bruno
Yes
Head of Product
N
Matt Davis
No
Head of Tech Operation
N
Tim Richmond
No
Head of Comms
N
Duncan Soutar
No
Secretary of TSC
N
Lloyd Duhon
No
Secretary of Budget Committee
N
Larisa Mcfarlane
No
Secretary of CCC
N
Terence McCutcheon
No
Secretary of OSC
N
Name
Attendance
Role
Yes
WG Lead/Secretary
Phil Lewis
Yes
ISC Member
Thiago Nunes
No
Interim ISC Member
Pedro Lucas
Yes
OSC Chair, Representing two Enterprise Members
Nicholas Cerny
No
Civics Committee Chair
Vaibhav S
Yes
GMC Member
Naushad Fouze
No
Product Committee
Jose Iadicicco
No
Community Member
Maureen Wepngong
No
DRep
Terence McCutcheon
No
Intersect
Tevo Saks
No
Community Member
Lorenzo Bruno
No
Head of Product Curation at Intersect
Recording: Intersect Governance WG Weekly - 2025/08/07 16:00 CEST - Recording
Transcript: Intersect Governance WG Weekly - 2025/08/07 16:00 CEST - Transcript
Decision-Making Process Workflow Discussion
Committee Stipend
Discussion Point
Notes
Actions: Responsible / Note
BPMN Diagram for Decision-Making
Simo presented an updated BPMN diagram that incorporates feedback from previous meetings, including separate swimlanes for working groups and committees. The diagram illustrates how proposals can originate from various stakeholders (members, staff, etc.) and flow through different levels of review (working group, committee, ISC, board). The need for a complementary document detailing timelines and SLAs was discussed. Phil suggested also mapping processes for changes initiated by staff or the board, not just members. Gintama proposed integrating this process into a new "member area" on the Intersect website to streamline creating and joining working groups.
Simo Simovic & Lorenzo Bruno: Continue to refine the BPMN diagram and its accompanying documentation.
Simo Simovic: Follow up with Lorenzo and Tex about the progress of the new member area.
Stipend Proposal Based on Peer Contribution
Lucas presented a new proposal for committee member stipends. His idea is to use a peer-review system where committee members evaluate each other's contributions on a scale, with a portion of the stipend (e.g., 40%) being distributed proportionally to a member's score. This approach aims to reward active participation and penalize "no-shows" while a baseline stipend remains. Phil suggested an alternative: using the peer scores as a threshold—if a member's score is below a certain point, they are ineligible for the stipend, simplifying the process.
Pedro Lucas: Share the spreadsheet and proposal on the ISC Discord channel. ISC Members: Review the document and be prepared to discuss it at the ISC meeting on August 18th.
Name
Attendance
Role
Yes
WG Lead/Secretary
Jack Briggs
No
Director of Ecosystem & Governance
Lawrence Clark
No
Head of Operations
Nick Cook
No
DHead of Membership & Community Hubs
Phil Lewis
Yes
ISC Member
Thiago Nunes
Yes
Interim ISC Member
Pedro Lucas
No
OSC Chair, Representing two Enterprise Members
Nicholas Cerny
Yes
Civics Committee member
Vaibhav S
Yes
GMC Member
Naushad Fouze
Yes
Product Committee member
Jose Iadicicco
Yes
Community Member
Discussion Point
Notes
Actions: Responsible / Note
Working Group Goals & Prioritization
- Discussion to define the working group's goals for the next 3-6 months.
- Review of proposed goals, including improving decision-making processes, board election processes, and committee composition.
- Agreement to prioritize goals through a voting process.
- Simo Simovic: Prepare documentation for next week's meeting to discuss the prioritized goals.
- Working Group: Review and discuss the proposed goals and prioritize them for action.
Intersect Governance Structure & Documentation
- Simo Simovic provided an update on the progress of documenting the current Intersect governance structure.
- Discussion on the need to capture the interconnections between different stakeholders (committees, board, executive team, staff).
- Agreement to review key documents like bylaws, membership governance, and the business plan.
- Simo Simovic: Continue working on the document capturing the current Intersect governance structure and stakeholder relationships.
Committee & Board Election Processes
- Discussion on improving the committee and board election processes.
- Emphasis on clarifying the roles and responsibilities of committee members.
- Proposal to separate board election rules from committee election rules.
- Concerns about ensuring fair representation and preventing civil attacks during elections.
Intersect Staff Decision-Making
- Discussion on the need to clarify how Intersect staff make decisions and where their authority comes from.
- Proposal to define processes for staff decision-making and reporting.
- Simo Simovic: Continue working on the document capturing the current Intersect governance structure and stakeholder relationships.
Yes
WG Lead/Secretary
Jack Briggs
Yes
Director of Ecosystem & Governance
Lawrence Clark
Yes
Head of Operation
Nick Cook
No
Head of Membership & Community Hubs
Phil Lewis
Yes
ISC Member
Thiago Nunes
No
Interim ISC Member
Pedro Lucas
No
OSC Chair, Representing two Enterprise Members
Nicholas Cerny
Yes
Civics Committee member
Vaibhav S
Yes
GMC Member
Naushad Fouze
No
Product Committee
Jose Iadicicco
Yes
Community Member
Tevo Saks
No
Community Member
Charter Ratification & Communication
Update that the working group charter has been ratified by the ISC.
Plan to announce the charter ratification through the Friday development update.
Agreement to publish meeting recordings and summaries on a dedicated Gitbook page under the ISC.
Simo Simovic: Work with the comms team to include the charter ratification in the Friday development update.
Simo Simovic: Create a Gitbook page for the working group to publish meeting records and summaries.
Budget Process Discussion
Provided an overview of the budget process, including the new proposal submission flow and the role of DReps.
Discussion of vendor selection, smart contracts, and treasury withdrawal procedures.
Concerns raised about potential delays in the budget process and the need for clear accountability
Further refine the operational process for budget management and smart contract implementation.
Vendor Relationships & Administration
Debate on Intersect's role as administrator for vendor proposals, especially when vendors are directly proposed without a competitive selection process.
Discussion on the criteria for selecting vendors and the potential risks involved. Proposal for a system where DReps approve a list of recognized administrator
Working Group: Further explore and define the criteria and process for vendor selection and administrator roles.
Governance Tooling & Data Handling
Update on the development of a new proposal submission tool in gov.tools. Clarification on API access to proposal data and security considerations for DRep validation.
Discussion on migrating the proposal process to be handled on-chain in the future.
GovTool Team: Continue development and refinement of the gov.tools proposal submission feature.
Election Data Analysis & Security
Proposal to form a subgroup to analyze previous election data for potential Sybil attacks.
Discussion on the methodology for analyzing registration timestamps, voting patterns, and payment information.
Jose & Volunteers: Form a team to analyze previous election data and report findings
Meeting Schedule & Attendance
Discussion about the scheduling conflict with the Product Committee meeting and the need to find a more suitable time for the Governance Working Group meeting.
Discuss via discord and determine a new meeting time that accommodates all regular participants.
Name
Attendance
Role
Yes
WG Lead/Secretary
Phil Lewis
No
ISC Member
Thiago Nunes
Yes
Interim ISC Member
Pedro Lucas
No
OSC Chair, Representing two Enterprise Members
Nicholas Cerny
No
Civics Committee Chair
Vaibhav S
Yes
GMC Member
Naushad Fouze
No
Product Committee
Jose Iadicicco
Yes
Community Member
Maureen Wepngong
Yes
DRep
Terence McCutcheon
Yes
Intersect
Tevo Saks
Yes
Community Member
Lorenzo Bruno
Yes
Head of Product Curation at Intersect
Recording: Intersect Governance WG Weekly - 2025/07/24 15:59 CEST - Recording
Transcript: Intersect Governance WG Weekly - 2025/07/24 15:59 CEST - Transcript
Update from next week
Decision-Making Process Workflow
Discussion Point
Notes
Actions: Responsible / Note
Update on Board Election Application Discussion
The prior, additional meeting focused on board election applications. It resulted in more questions than answers regarding feasibility and implementation of potential features. No concrete actions were taken from that specific discussion, which was primarily for brainstorming.
Lorenzo will provide full clarification on the outcomes of the meeting, referencing the Miro board for details.
Review and Refinement of Decision-Making Process Diagram
A first draft of a Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) diagram visualizing Intersect's decision-making process was created. The goal is to clearly document and visualize how ideas, proposals, and recommendations flow from initiation to execution within Intersect. The diagram aims to help members and associates understand where to submit ideas and how the process works. Key questions raised include: specific contact points for submitting ideas, timelines for committee review/response, and overall process duration. It was noted that this diagram represents the current state of the process, which is being documented before potential simplification.
All participants are to review the diagram and provide feedback. Simo Simovic will continue to refine the diagram and associated written explanations. The group plans to continue discussion on the decision-making process at the next weekly call.
Directional Flow and Feedback Loops in the Diagram
Concerns were raised about the diagram's unidirectional arrows, specifically regarding information flow from the Board back to the ISC or relevant committees after a decision is made and executed. It was clarified that this feedback loop already exists in practice (e.g., executive team updates ISC in meetings) but needs to be explicitly visualized in the diagram to accurately reflect the current state.
Simo Simovic will incorporate bidirectional arrows or notification points in the BPMN diagram to represent existing feedback loops, particularly from the Board back to the ISC/relevant committees.
Redundancy Checks for Proposals
A participant suggested incorporating a triage step at the beginning of the proposal submission process to check for redundancy with existing proposals or ongoing work. This would prevent duplicated efforts and encourage collaboration. It was also suggested to track how long proposals stay at each stage of the process to identify bottlenecks.
Software for Process Management & Democratic Participation
Discussion briefly touched on using open-source tools for process management (e.g., ClickUp, previously suggested “Camunda” by another member) and for democratic participation. An open-source software called "Decidim" was suggested for research, offering features like proposal creation, debate support, and vote traceability.
Simo Simovic expressed he would likely lead any internal development for such a platform if needed.
BPMN Diagram Notations & Consistency
Discussion occurred regarding the consistent use of colors and notations for comments, actions, and information items within the BPMN Diagram.
Simo Simovic will ensure consistency in notation.
Name
Attendance
Role
Yes
WG Lead/Secretary
Jack Briggs
No
Director of Ecosystem & Governance
Lawrence Clark
No
Head of Operation
Nick Cook
No
Head of Membership & Community Hubs
Phil Lewis
Yes
ISC Member
Thiago Nunes
No
Interim ISC Member
Pedro Lucas
No
OSC Chair, Representing two Enterprise Members
Nicholas Cerny
No
Civics Committee member
Vaibhav S
Yes
GMC Member
Naushad Fouze
No
Product Committee
Jose Iadicicco
No
Community Member
Tevo Saks
Yes
Community Member
Nana Safo
Yes
DRep
David Muzzi
Yes
Intersect
Recording: Intersect Governance WG Weekly - 2025/04/22 14:59 CEST - Recording
Transcript: Intersect Governance WG Weekly - 2025/04/22 14:59 CEST - Transcript
Update from last week
WG Delivery Timeline
Discussion Point
Notes
Actions: Responsible / Note
WG Timeline Discussion
Review of the Miro board with agreed-upon goals: staff decision-making, board election improvement, and committee election improvement.
Initial discussion on creating a timeline (Q2/Q3/Q4 2025) for achieving these goals. Continue working on WG timeline/roadmap next week
- Working Group: Continue working on the timeline for each goal on the Miro board.
Governance Processes Document
The draft document summarizing current governance processes is ready for review.
Plan to review and analyze the document in the next 1-2 weeks to identify gaps and potential improvements.
Clarification sought on the meaning of "gaps" (missing information vs. process flaws).
Discussion on the role of secretaries and their official recognition.
Simo Simovic - Add committee secretary role and responsibilities to the current Gov Process Document
Election Processes & Tooling
- Discussion on documenting election processes for both Board and committees.
Inquiry about the possibility of community members using Intersect's membership tool for their own elections.
Brief discussion on the limitations and focus of current governance tools (Gov Tool).
Mention of a long-term goal to move towards more direct democracy for Intersect members.
Simo Simovic: Continue working on a document explaining the election processes.
Yes
WG Lead/Secretary
Jack Briggs
No
Director of Ecosystem & Governance
Lawrence Clark
Yes
Head of Operations
Nick Cook
No
Head of Membership & Community Hubs
Phil Lewis
Yes
ISC Member
Thiago Nunes
Yes
Interim ISC Member
Pedro Lucas
Yes
OSC Chair, Representing two Enterprise Members
Nicholas Cerny
Yes
Civics Committee member
Vaibhav S
Yes
GMC Member
Additional Attendees:
Larisa Mcfarlane - Observer
David Muzzi - Observer
Terence McCutcheon - Observer
Recording: Intersect Governance WG Kick Off - 2025/03/11 15:58 CET - Recording
Transcript: Intersect Governance WG Kick Off - 2025/03/11 15:58 CET - Transcript
Introduction
WG Charter Draft Review
WG Purpose Discussion
Prioritization & Next Steps
Decision:
Discussion Point
Notes
Actions: Responsible / Note
Working Group Charter & Purpose
- Phil Lewis and Simo Simovic presented a draft charter for the working group, outlining its purpose and goals. - Discussions focused on defining the scope of the group, including improving committee structures, board elections, and overall governance processes. - The importance of understanding the current state of Intersect governance was emphasized, including reviewing key documents like the bylaws, membership governance document, and business plan.
- Agreement to operate under Chatham House rules.
- Simo Simovic: Add all relevant governance documents (bylaws, membership governance, business plan) to the Miro board.
- Simo Simovic: Finalize and distribute the working group charter for review and approval at the next meeting.
- Simo Simovic: Research and present a visualization of the current Intersect governance processes.
Open Communication & Information Sharing
- Concerns were raised about the openness of working groups and the need for transparent communication. <br> - Agreement to maintain an open Discord channel for community input, while meetings may be for working group members only. <br> - Discussion on how to handle sensitive information and ensure appropriate information sharing. <br> - Discussion on the need for a full time person to track and automate governance processes.
- Terence McCutcheon: Ensure the Discord channel for the working group is open for public comments. - Simo Simovic: Create meeting minutes, actions and share with everyone.
- Working Group: Discuss and establish clear guidelines for information sharing and transparency.
Prioritization & Next Steps
- The group discussed prioritizing key areas for improvement, including board elections, committee structures, and legitimizing committees via DRep involvement. <br> - Agreement to start by reviewing the current governance documents and visualizing the processes. <br> - Discussion on the upcoming committee elections and the need to improve the process for future elections. <br> - Agreement to hold weekly meetings at the same time.
- Simo Simovic: Schedule weekly meetings for the working group.
- Working Group Members: Review the provided governance documents before the next meeting. - Simo Simovic: Collect and add documentation related to board election improvement proposals to the Miro board. - Simo Simovic: Research and reach out to Matthew Capps regarding the work of the previous committee design working group.
Yes
WG Lead/Secretary
Jack Briggs
No
Director of Ecosystem & Governance
Lawrence Clark
No
Head of Operation
Nick Cook
No
Head of Membership & Community Hubs
Phil Lewis
Yes
ISC Member
Thiago Nunes
No
Interim ISC Member
Pedro Lucas
No
OSC Chair, Representing two Enterprise Members
Nicholas Cerny
No
Civics Committee member
Vaibhav S
Yes
GMC Member
Naushad Fouze
No
Product Committee
Jose Iadicicco
No
Community Member
Tevo Saks
No
Community Member
Olivier rishi Matabaro
Yes
Community Member
Nana Safo
Yes
DRep
Update from last week
- Simo Simovic provided an update: WG purpose and goals were included in the Weekly Development report, last Friday.
- WG Knowledge Base is created, WG Charter and all meeting summary and recordings have been published as agreed.
- Simo Simovic: Publish this week meeting summary and recording on WG Knowledge Base
Governance Processes Document
- Simo Simovic shared a document summarizing current stakeholder roles and decision-making processes within Intersect. - Feedback was sought on the document's accuracy and completeness.
- Working Group: Review the governance processes document and provide feedback.
Workflow & Decision-Making
- Discussion on the workflow of information and decisions within Intersect, including the roles of committees, chairs, secretaries, and staff.
- Clarification on how committees interact with the ISC, executive team, and the board.
- Simo: Incorporate feedback into the governance processes document, particularly regarding the roles of chairs and secretaries.
Duplication of Work & Coordination
- Concerns raised about potential duplication of work between committees and working groups.
- Discussion on improving communication and coordination to avoid redundant efforts.
- Working Group: Explore strategies for better coordination and communication between committees and working groups.
Committee Autonomy & Decision Thresholds
- Discussion on the level of autonomy committees have in making decisions and when to escalate decisions to the ISC, board, or wider membership.
- Working Group: Develop recommendations for clear decision-making thresholds and escalation processes.
Budgeting & Financial Incentives
- Discussion on how budget processes are currently implemented and the need for clear documentation.
- Concerns about potential conflicts of interest related to incentivizing committee members.
- Inquiry about the budget for Intersect staff and potential remuneration for committee members.
Name
Attendance
Role
Yes
WG Lead/Secretary
Phil Lewis
Yes
ISC Member
Thiago Nunes
No
Interim ISC Member
Pedro Lucas
Yes
OSC Chair, Representing two Enterprise Members
Nicholas Cerny
Yes
Civics Committee Chair
Vaibhav S
Yes
GMC Member
Naushad Fouze
Yes
Product Committee
Jose Iadicicco
Yes
Community Member
Maureen Wepngong
Yes
DRep
Terence McCutcheon
Yes
Intersect
Tevo Saks
No
Community Member
Nana Safo
No
DRep
Discussion Point
Notes
Actions: Responsible / Note
Voting Member Criteria and Quorum
Discussion on defining who is eligible to be a voting member of the WG, including ideas such as attendance thresholds (e.g., 3 meetings to join, 2 missed to drop off). Agreement to start with a list and adjust if needed.
Simo: Track attendance and maintain list of voting members; group agreed on a flexible threshold-based approach.
Recommendation Register & Problem Framing
Discussion on improving how issues are entered into the recommendation register, emphasizing clarity in problem statements before discussing solutions.
All members: Review and revise entries to clearly state problem statements; flag high-priority items for next meeting.
Election Transparency and Voting Stats
Debate on the value and risks of live voting stats and dashboards. Pros: improved transparency and campaign adaptation. Cons: strategic voting, potential bias.
Marine, Gintama: Reframe suggestions as problem statements and update register; Phil: Flag topic for further review next session.
One-Person-One-Vote Concerns
Concerns about sybil resistance, especially for board elections. Suggestions included KYC, participation tracking, and merging multiple accounts under one identity.
Phil: Mark sybil resistance for board election as high priority; Lorenzo, Pedro: Explore options for identifying and merging accounts.
Technical Barriers to Membership
Issue raised that wallet-based payments for membership are not functioning consistently. Impacts community participation.
Meeting Structure and Time Use
Agreement to structure meetings with focus on problem statements first, and reserve time for solution ideation. Consider asynchronous collaboration or breakout sessions.
Name
Attendance
Role
Yes
WG Lead/Secretary
Phil Lewis
No
ISC Member
Thiago Nunes
No
Interim ISC Member
Pedro Lucas
No
OSC Chair, Representing two Enterprise Members
Nicholas Cerny
Yes
Civics Committee Chair
Vaibhav S
Yes
GMC Member
Naushad Fouze
No
Product Committee
Jose Iadicicco
Yes
Community Member
Maureen Wepngong
No
DRep
Terence McCutcheon
Yes
Intersect
Tevo Saks
No
Community Member
Lorenzo Bruno
Yes
Head of Product Curation
Discussion Point
Notes
Actions: Responsible / Note
Update on Board Election Recommendations
The recommendations from the working group were presented to the Intersect Steering Committee (ISC) and then to the Board. The Board accepted the core recommendations with minor refinements.
Lorenzo and team will begin refining the details of the approved recommendations, which includes adjusting the voting tool and understanding verification options (proof of life, KYC, other external tools).
Board Election Details
The Board confirmed that four community seats will be elected, with the top two having two-year terms and the next two having one-year terms. The membership duration requirement for voting was increased from three to six months. If a member fails to renew their membership for six months, their membership "counting" (for the six-month rule) restarts. The Board was receptive to the idea of overlapping terms by starting the election in September.
Lorenzo and team will lead the process of drilling down into the details and timing for the upcoming board election.
Applicant Qualifications for Board/Committee Seats
The Board is now also focusing on the quality and details of candidates for board elections. There's a concern that popular candidates may be elected over more qualified experts. The idea of improving candidate presentation on the website with more dynamic information (e.g., proofs of contribution, videos) was raised.
Tex will prepare a rough draft of applicant qualifications to be presented in a month's time.
Jose will write a problem statement on improving candidate presentation for discussion.
Gintama will also revise his problem statement regarding the election of "popular" candidates.
Simo will facilitate the discussion on improving applicant quality.
Committee Member Attendance and Removal
A significant issue with newly and formerly elected committee members not attending for months was highlighted. The need for a process to address this, including potential removal from committees, was discussed.
Tex will add the issue of committee member attendance and removal as a problem statement in the recommendation register and prepare documentation for next week's discussion, including an 8-week non-participation cycle.
Process for Decision-Making (Workflow)
The working group aims to document a clear, usable process for decision-making within Intersect, from working groups through committees to the Board. This includes defining how individual members can raise initiatives.
This topic will be on the agenda for next week's meeting. The working group will review the existing Miro board containing initial drafts and examples of workflows.
Working Group Leadership Transition
Simo announced he will be on PTO for the next two weeks.
Lorenzo will lead the working group meetings and handle summaries/publishing during Simo's absence.
Name
Attendance
Role
Yes
WG Lead/Secretary
Phil Lewis
Yes
ISC Member
Thiago Nunes
Yes
Interim ISC Member
Pedro Lucas
No
OSC Chair, Representing two Enterprise Members
Nicholas Cerny
No
Civics Committee Chair
Vaibhav S
Yes
GMC Member
Naushad Fouze
Yes
Product Committee
Lorenzo Bruno
Yes
Head of Product Curation
Maureen Wepngong
Yes
DRep
Terence McCutcheon
Yes
Intersect
Tevo Saks
Yes
Community Member
Elaine Cardenas
Yes
Recording: Intersect Governance WG Weekly - 2025/05/29 15:59 CEST - Recording
Transcript: Intersect Governance WG Weekly - 2025/05/29 15:59 CEST - Transcript
Update from last week
Recommendations Discussion
Discussion Point
Notes
Actions: Responsible / Note
Board Election Risks & Problems
The group discussed high-priority risks for the upcoming board election, focusing on "sybil attacks" due to paid and powerful board seats. Participants brainstormed additional concerns like unvalidated candidate profiles and paid memberships, emphasizing the need for data and proactive solutions.
The Secretary to ensure Miro board access.
Participants to add identified risks to Miro.
Legitimacy & Board Perception
Concerns were raised about how the broader community perceives Intersect's elected board members, potentially impacting funding. Debate covered whether Intersect serves DReps or community members, and ideas for balancing member participation with broader Cardano governance. The aim is to clarify Intersect's purpose and ensure transparency.
Candidate Competence & Selection
The group discussed attracting competent candidates. A proposal for pre-election "town halls" or workshops was made to foster community engagement with potential candidates, without tying it to eligibility.
Board Term Extension
The board is considering extending terms from one to two years for continuity.
The Secretary to confirm board term extension status.
Solutions & Asynchronous Work
Key risks (vote buying, legitimacy, participation, candidate quality) were summarized. The group plans to brainstorm solutions. A document on "Sybill Attack Resistance" will be reviewed, and its points added to the Miro board for discussion.
Participants to propose solutions on Miro.
The Secretary to add "Sybil Attack Resistance" document to the next agenda.
Individuals to extract points from the document for Miro.
Name
Attendance
Role
No
WG Lead/Secretary
Phil Lewis
Yes
ISC Member
Thiago Nunes
Yes
Interim ISC Member
Pedro Lucas
Yes
OSC Chair, Representing two Enterprise Members
Nicholas Cerny
No
Civics Committee Chair
Vaibhav S
Yes
GMC Member
Naushad Fouze
Yes
Product Committee
Jose Iadicicco
Yes
Community Member
Maureen Wepngong
Yes
DRep
Terence McCutcheon
Yes
Intersect
Tevo Saks
No
Community Member
Lorenzo Bruno
Yes
Recording: Intersect Governance WG Weekly - 2025/06/19 15:57 CEST - Recording
Transcript: Intersect Governance WG Weekly - 2025/06/19 15:57 CEST - Notes by Gemini
Board Election Recommendations Discussion
Discuss the decision-making workflow
Discussion Point
Notes
Actions: Responsible / Note
Prioritization of Open Topics
Discussion points from Discord were identified, including concerns about extra burden on users, UX issues, clarifying the term "later," and outlining what voids a vote. Phil also brought up points on changing bylaws and a new idea related to the early session.
The group decided to run through open topics one by one to close loops.
Revised Presentation for ISC
Phil presented a modified version of the deck, suggesting a simpler approach for the ISC. He emphasized reducing the burden on members to avoid decreasing participation and highlighted two primary recommendations: restricting voting based on membership duration (e.g., three months prior) and adding a multiplier for enterprise members' voting power to increase the cost of vote-buying attacks (e.g., 20x). The presentation also acknowledged other considered mitigations that would add friction to legitimate members and are not being recommended at this stage.
Membership UX/Friction
Phil clarified that his UX concerns stemmed from potential extra steps required for members to vote, which could deter participation, especially with current low engagement rates (25-30%). Lorenzo noted that new members joining close to an election might still need an option to verify their identity (e.g., DID, KYC, proof of life) to participate without imposing a mandatory burden.
The presentation will emphasize minimizing friction for legitimate members while still addressing security. The possibility of offering an identity verification option for late joiners will be considered.
Bylaws and Legal Standing
Phil stated that existing bylaws and Wyoming law might already be sufficient to address malicious actors. Lorenzo argued that clarifying the bylaws for "one person, one individual membership" would make enforcement more straightforward, even if the legal process for removal or vote nullification remains arduous. Discussion around enterprise vs. individual memberships and their voting power also came up.
The group will re-examine the bylaws to determine if clarifications are needed regarding individual vs. enterprise memberships and their voting rights, ensuring clear guidelines for the audit process.
Risk Assessment and Impact
Tex expressed concern that the discussion might be overcomplicating the membership process and that the risk of nefarious actors gaining control might be a "medium risk" rather than severe, arguing for a focus on incentivizing legitimate participation. Phil countered that the worst-case scenario (nefarious actors changing bylaws to lock in control) is severe. The group generally settled on the risk being "severe" with a "possible" likelihood.
The presentation will clearly articulate the severe impact of the risk (board majority by malicious actors) and the "possible" likelihood of it occurring.
Incentivizing Member Participation
Phil suggested exploring ways to incentivize members to vote and participate, moving from a "preventing bad actors" mindset to a more positive "encouraging good actors" approach. Ideas included reimbursing membership fees for voting.
This remains an area for future exploration and discussion as a long-term mitigation strategy, but is not part of the immediate recommendations.
Member Renewals and Data
Gintama inquired about current membership renewal rates and how they might inform voter numbers for the October election. Lorenzo noted that renewals have just begun, and more definitive data will be available in 6-8 weeks.
The team will monitor membership renewal data to get a clearer picture of potential voter turnout for the October election.
Business Process Management
Pedro introduced tools like Camunda for business process modeling and workflow management, suggesting their potential for mapping Intersect's governance processes, tracking actions, and archiving evidence.
Board Election Timeline
The board election is expected to start in September and conclude in early October. This means changes need to be in place by the end of June/early July to allow for communication and implementation.
The group will aim to present the recommendations to the ISC next Monday, with a push to surface them directly to the board next week if ISC is amenable, to ensure timely implementation before September.
Workshop for ISC (Decision-Making Workflow)
The second agenda item for the meeting was to discuss the decision-making workflow using a Miro board, to prepare a first draft for the ISC.
This discussion was deferred due to the in-depth focus on election vulnerabilities. It remains an important topic for a future session.
Meeting Introduction
ISC new elected members
ISC Actions/Update from last week
Observers from committees to join ISC call
Update from Committees and Business Function (If Any)
AOB & Meeting Close
Additional Attendees:
Adam Rusch - Community Board Seat - Observer
It was announced that two new community members, Sheldon Hunt and Fred Tanaka, have been elected to the ISC. They will be onboarded and begin participating in meetings starting next week. Consideration will be given to adjusting meeting times to better accommodate time zones.
Progress updates were shared on several items:
The revised organizational chart reflecting internal transitions is due by the end of the week and will be submitted to the board for approval.
A transition plan to replace consultants with direct hires is being finalized, with implementation starting in July and running for 12 months.
The Technical Steering Committee will receive a briefing on smart contract and budget contract details at their next meeting.
The election for a new ISC chair will be scheduled once the new members are fully onboarded.
A contingency plan related to budget approval is now deprioritized following a successful DRep vote.
Planning is underway for monthly AMA sessions, with the first expected within the next one to two weeks.
A final decision was made that Intersect, as an organization, will not run for a seat in the upcoming Constitutional Committee elections. However, individual Intersect team members may participate in their personal capacity.
A proposal was discussed to allow committee observers to attend ISC meetings in order to improve transparency and cross-committee understanding. A poll will be launched to gather feedback from ISC voting members.
There was discussion around committees whose budget proposals did not meet funding thresholds. Alternative pathways, such as Catalyst, were mentioned as potential options. It was clarified that committee stipends may still support oversight efforts for projects that do receive funding.
A discussion was held around the remit of the Membership & Community Committee (MCC) and how the value of Intersect membership is communicated and perceived. Participants reflected on the broader relationship between membership benefits and Intersect’s role as an administrative body.
Send onboarding emails to Sheldon Hunt and Fred Tanaka and invite them to the next ISC call
Provide a list of current consultant roles to the ISC next week
Create a poll on Discord regarding the addition of committee observers to ISC calls
Committees Update
ISC Actions/Update from last week
Committee Elections timeline
Decision Making Workflow
AOB & Meeting Close
Valeria Devaux - Observer
Thiago Nunes - Observer
Budget Committee Presented the 2026 budget framework to the Board, with feedback being gathered from DReps and translated for regional workshops. Discussions included timing of the process (avoiding December/January), potential for multi-year budgeting, etc.
Product Committee Workshops on the Cardano 2030 Vision & Strategy continue globally, with a consolidated draft to be prepared for DRep voting once feedback is complete. Drafts remain open for community review.
Civics Committee A Constitutional Amendment Working Group is launching soon. Work continues on the optional DRep compensation CIP and grant process, with refinements to be shared.
Technical Steering Committee (TSC) Held a successful developer workshop on node diversity and is continuing a series on ledger improvements. Technical proposals include adjusting transaction execution units and preparing for an early-2026 hard fork, followed by the “Dyster” era later in 2026.
Membership Committee Preparing updates to member benefits within three weeks. Work is underway to reconnect with hubs and explore a sustainable hub strategy without a dedicated budget.
The IMM survey is scheduled for publication the following day and will run for six weeks, with results feeding into the Annual Member Meeting.
The Service Rewards Policy remains under legal review. If significant changes are required, the policy will be re-shared with ISC. If no major changes are needed, it will stand as approved and move forward to implementation.
The board election process has concluded, with results and an audit report to be published shortly. Participation reached 22%, reflecting strong engagement. Committee elections will open in early October and close later in the month, with results expected in early November. All eight committees will participate, supported by updated application packs, translations, and community Q&A sessions. Two ISC seats will also be open in this cycle.
A BPMN diagram and supporting document outlining Intersect’s decision-making workflow were presented. The process has been validated through recent examples and will be published for transparency. Members are invited to provide feedback, with the goal of refining the process and eventually implementing it in tooling for clarity and accountability.
ISC Members: Review and comment on the decision-making workflow.
Publish the AMM Survey this week
Meeting Introduction
Board Updates & Organizational Changes
ISC Actions/Update from last week
Monthly leadership AMA meeting
CC Election - Should Intersect run for the CC seat
Update from Committees and Business Function (If Any)
AOB & Meeting Close
Additional Attendees:
Adam Rusch - Community Board Seat - Observer
Updates were shared regarding recent structural shifts within Intersect. The revised budget proposal (15.75m ada) was presented, reflecting a more accurate projection of costs and a phased reduction in consultant dependency starting in July. There was discussion around evolving the board structure to include four elected community seats by October 2025, aiming for a fully elected board by 2026. Additional oversight mechanisms are planned for critical operations, including the CDH and the use of multi-signature authorizations. Greater clarity around decision-making and delivery sustainability was emphasized.
It was confirmed that candidate registration for the Constitutional Council (CC) elections is now open.
An update was shared on smart contract progress being led by SundaeSwap Labs. A video overview is now available, and upcoming open office hours will provide space for discussions with vendors, committees, and the community to deepen understanding of implementation impacts.
A discussion took place regarding whether Intersect should seek a seat on the Constitutional Council. The prevailing sentiment was that Intersect should focus on its core functions and avoid potential conflicts of interest. A vote was conducted but lacked quorum, and it was agreed to proceed with an asynchronous vote via Discord. Initial feedback from present members supported Intersect not standing for a CC seat.
A proposal was introduced to host monthly open ISC calls (AMA-style) for members to raise concerns and receive responses. There was agreement on piloting this idea, possibly incorporating a form where members can log issues in advance to support structured discussion.
It was suggested that internal "all-hands" calls between committee members could support better collaboration, knowledge sharing, and alignment on resources and efforts.
There was follow-up on a request for a membership vote to ratify the revised budget process. It was acknowledged that the change had already been implemented without prior endorsement. It was agreed this action is now closed, with a shared commitment to ensuring future significant process changes include member sanctioning.
A proposal was made to introduce a rotating observer role for committee members in ISC meetings, helping them gain visibility into discussions and coordination at the steering level. This idea will be revisited at the next meeting.
Finalize and share the consultant transition plan with the ISC.
Share the roles and responsibilities document for committees with ISC members.
Record the asynchronous vote on whether Intersect should stand for a CC seat on Discord.
Present the ISC’s recommendation on CC participation to the full board.
Create a poll on Discord to gauge support for a monthly open ISC call.
Develop and communicate a process for monthly AMA sessions, including a feedback form.
Explore the feasibility of internal all-hands calls for committee collaboration.
Add the observer role proposal to the next meeting agenda.
Name
Attendance
Role
Voting Seat (Y/N)
Yes
Secretary
N
Jack Briggs
No
Interim Executive Director
Y
Nick Cook
Yes
Director - Operations (Interim)
Y
YUTA
No
Community Member Seat
Y
Phil Lewis
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Thiago Nunes
Yes
Interim Community Member Seat
Y
Pedro Lucas
Yes
OSC Chair
Y
Samuel Leathers
Yes
Product Chair
Y
Darlington Welsh
Yes
MCC Chair
Y
Prof. Steven
No
Chair of Board of Directors and CBC Chair
Y
Kevin Hammond
No
TSC Chair
Y
Simon Fleck
No
GMC Chair
Y
Jose Miguel De Gamboa
No
CCC Chair
Y
Christian Taylor
Yes
Head of OSO
N
Lorenzo Bruno
No
Head of Product
N
Yes
Head of Tech Operation
N
Duncan Soutar
Yes
Secretary of TSC
N
Lloyd Duhon
Yes
Secretary of Budget Committee
N
Larisa Mcfarlane
No
Secretary of CCC
N
Terence McCutcheon
Yes
Secretary of OSC
N
Kyle Solomon
Yes
Product Co-Chair
N
Name
Attendance
Role
Voting Seat (Y/N)
No
Secretary
N
Jack Briggs
No
Interim Executive Director
Y
Nick Cook
Yes
Director - Operations (Interim)
Y
YUTA
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Phil Lewis
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Sheldon Hunt
No
Community Member Seat
Y
Fred Tanaka
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Elaine Cardenas
Yes
OSC Chair
Y
Samuel Leathers
No
Product Chair
Y
Darlington Welsh
Yes
MCC Chair
Y
Kristijan Kowalsky
Yes
CBC Chair
Y
Kevin Hammond
Yes
TSC Chair
Y
Wes Parkison
No
GMC Chair
Y
Nicolas Cerny
Yes
CCC Chair
Y
Christian Taylor
No
Head of OSO
N
Lorenzo Bruno
Yes
Head of Product
N
Matt Davis
No
Head of Tech Operation
N
Tim Richmond
No
Head of Comms
N
Lloyd Duhon
Yes
Secretary of Budget Committee
N
Larisa Mcfarlane
Yes
Secretary of CCC
N
Terence McCutcheon
Yes
Secretary of OSC
N
Name
Attendance
Role
Voting Seat (Y/N)
Yes
Secretary
N
Jack Briggs
Yes
Interim Executive Director
Y
Nick Cook
No
Director - Operations (Interim)
Y
YUTA
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Phil Lewis
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Thiago Nunes
No
Interim Community Member Seat
Y
Pedro Lucas
Yes
OSC Chair
Y
Samuel Leathers
No
Product Chair
Y
Darlington Welsh
Yes
MCC Chair
Y
Prof. Steven
Yes
Chair of Board of Directors and CBC Chair
Y
Kevin Hammond
No
TSC Chair
Y
Simon Fleck
No
GMC Chair
Y
Jose Miguel De Gamboa
Yes
CCC Chair
Y
Christian Taylor
Yes
Head of OSO
N
Lorenzo Bruno
Yes
Head of Product
N
No
Head of Tech Operation
N
Duncan Soutar
No
Secretary of TSC
N
Lloyd Duhon
Yes
Secretary of Budget Committee
N
Larisa Mcfarlane
No
Secretary of CCC
N
Terence McCutcheon
Yes
Secretary of OSC
N
Kyle Solomon
Yes
Product Co-Chair
N
Name
Attendance
Role
Yes
WG Lead/Secretary
Jack Briggs
No
Interim Executive Director
Nick Cook
No
Head of Membership & Community Hubs
Phil Lewis
Yes
ISC Member
Thiago Nunes
Yes
Interim ISC Member
Pedro Lucas
Yes
OSC Chair, Representing two Enterprise Members
Nicholas Cerny
No
Civics Committee member
Vaibhav S
Yes
GMC Member
Naushad Fouze
No
Product Committee
Jose Iadicicco
Yes
Community Member
Tevo Saks
No
Community Member
Nana Safo
Yes
DRep
Maureen Wepngong
Yes
DRep
David Muzzi
No
Intersect
Discussion Point
Notes
Actions: Responsible / Note
Meeting Intro & Goals
Simo Simovic welcomed attendees, including a new WG member, Maureen.
Reiterated the working group's three main goals: improving staff decision-making, board election processes, and committee elections.
Simo Simovic: Grant Maureen access to the working group's document folder
Simo: Published Meeting Summary on ISC Knowledge Base
Bylaw Review & Election Improvement
Discussion on the need to update the bylaws to facilitate election improvements, particularly regarding civil attack prevention.
Differing opinions on whether bylaw changes are necessary or if internal governance documents are sufficient.
Working Group: Recommendation to focus on developing election improvement recommendations first, then address bylaw changes if needed.
Timeline & Workflow
Discussion on establishing a delivery timeline for the working group's goals.
Agreement to prioritize reviewing the current state of governance, identifying gaps, and recommending improvements.
Emphasis on being agile and adapting the timeline as information becomes available.
Addressing Misconduct & Accountability
Call for clear guidelines on how to address misconduct and hold individuals accountable within the organization.
Working Group: Develop recommendations for addressing misconduct and accountability mechanisms.
Secretary Role & Responsibilities
Clarification on the role of committee secretaries as coordinators between committees and Intersect staff. Formal description of the secretary role and responsibilities is documented and added to the Summary of Gov Processes (Current State)
Roadmap & Measurement
Discussion on the roadmap for achieving the working group's goals.
Initial thoughts on measuring the effectiveness of governance processes and reporting quality.
Election Endorsement Template
Pedro Lucas proposed creating a Google Doc template for members to publicly endorse election candidates.
Action to create and share this template with the community.
Pedro Lucas: Create and share a Google Doc template for election endorsements.
Document Review & Collaboration
Agreement to review the "summary of the processes" document and the "committee election process overview" document.
Phil Lewis suggested using a collaborative spreadsheet to track recommendations and issues.
Simo Simovic: Convert the "election improvement Doc" PDF to a Word document.
Phil Lewis: Create a Google Sheet to track recommendations and issues for each goal.
Meeting Structure & Communication
Suggestion to split future meetings into document review and recommendation discussion.
Call for clear communication channels and information sharing within the working group.
Simo Simovic: Consider splitting future meeting agendas.
Committee Mandate Length
It was proposed to extend committee member mandates to two years for better long-term engagement.
Working Group: Discuss the possibility of recommending changes to committee mandate lengths.
Name
Attendance
Role
Yes
WG Lead/Secretary
Phil Lewis
Yes
ISC Member
Thiago Nunes
Yes
Interim ISC Member
Pedro Lucas
No
OSC Chair, Representing two Enterprise Members
Nicholas Cerny
Yes
Civics Committee Chair
Vaibhav S
Yes
GMC Member
Naushad Fouze
No
Product Committee
Jose Iadicicco
Yes
Community Member
Maureen Wepngong
No
DRep
Terence McCutcheon
Yes
Intersect
Tevo Saks
No
Community Member
Lorenzo Bruno
Yes
Head of Product Curation at Intersect
Discussion Point
Notes
Actions: Responsible / Note
Dismissal Policy Update
A dismissal policy was presented to and approved by the Intersect Steering Committee (ISC) on Monday. It is now posted on the committee's page and will be incorporated into future application slides to inform applicants. It will be directly managed with committee secretaries, with potential pending removals by early September.
A representative is implementing the policy with committee secretaries and chairs. The policy is accessible on the committee's page and will be integrated into future application materials.
Decision-Making Process Workflow
The working group reviewed a high-level Miro board mapping the decision-making flow within Intersect (from member/working group to committee, Board, and community). The aim is to standardize and document this process to ensure clarity for all participants and potentially simplify current complexities. Suggestions were made to map processes using BPMN (Business Process Model Notation) for clearer tracking and potentially automate parts of the workflow.
Simo (Lead) and Lorenzo will collaborate to create a BPMN version of the decision-making process for review and refinement by the working group. This will be an agenda item for next week's call.
Applicant Qualification Recommendations Update
The working group's initial suggestions for applicant qualifications (e.g., understanding the Cardano community, the Board, Intersect) were well-received by the Board with minor refinements. They were also presented to the ISC for feedback.
Lorenzo will continue to refine these recommendations, aiming to finalize them by the end of the month for Board approval. The Board's feedback on these recommendations is pending and will be incorporated.
Candidate Endorsements
The idea of requiring candidate endorsements from Intersect members (potentially 10) was heavily discussed as a prerequisite or an optional, weighted factor. There was debate on whether such a requirement would be too burdensome or give unfair advantage to well-known individuals.
The concept of candidate endorsements (whether mandatory pre-application or optional at application/voting stage) will be further discussed in a follow-up meeting, potentially as a test case for this year's election if feasible within development timelines.
Name
Attendance
Role
Yes
WG Lead/Secretary
Jack Briggs
No
Head of Ecosystem & Governance
Lawrence Clark
No
Head of Operation
Nick Cook
No
Head of Membership & Community Hubs
Phil Lewis
Yes
ISC Member
Thiago Nunes
Yes
Interim ISC Member
Pedro Lucas
No
OSC Chair, Representing two Enterprise Members
Nicholas Cerny
No
Civics Committee member
Vaibhav S
Yes
GMC Member
Lloyd Duhon - Observer
David Muzzi - Observer
Terence McCutcheon - Observer
Recording: Intersect Governance WG Weekly - 2025/03/18 15:52 CET - Recording
Transcript: Intersect Governance WG Weekly - 2025/03/18 15:52 CET - Transcript
Jose Intro
Finalize WG Charter
WG Goals
Decision: All WG members agreed that WG Charter is Final v1. Ready to be presented to ISC for approval.
Discussion Point
Notes
Actions: Responsible / Note
Member Validation & KYC
- Discussion on member validation, particularly for anonymous members.
- Concerns about potential Sybil attacks and the need for a validation process.
- Debate on whether to focus on stricter candidate requirements or voter restrictions.
- Proposal to require committee candidates to have prior work group or committee experience.
Simo Simovic: Review and share the anti-Sybil attack recommendation from the MCC.
Working Group: Continue discussion on member validation and candidate requirements during future election process reviews.
Charter Review & Goal Setting
- Review of the working group charter, with edits and clarifications.
- Discussion on the scope of the charter and whether to include implementation details.
- Proposal to add "Intersect members" to the list of key stakeholders.
- Initial discussion on working group goals, with plans to finalize them in the next meeting.
- Simo Simovic: Update the charter with agreed-upon edits (adding "Intersect members").
- Working Group: Finalize working group goals in the next meeting.
AI Integration & Tooling
- Proposal to use AI agents for governance support, ethical guidance, and conflict resolution.
- Concerns about potential dehumanization and community reliance on AI.
- Discussion on the feasibility and messaging of AI integration.
- Simo Simovic: Add AI integration to the backlog for future discussion.
Intersect Governance Structure & Processes
- Discussion on the current Intersect governance structure and information flow.
- Request for a comprehensive overview of all existing processes between stakeholders.
- Debate on whether a pyramid structure accurately represents the organization.
- Clarification on the role of the ISC (Intersect Steering Committee) and its reporting cadence.
- Simo Simovic: Create a detailed overview of the current Intersect governance processes and stakeholder interconnections.
- Working Group: Review and discuss the governance overview in the next meeting.
Communication & Collaboration
- Clarification on the role of committee chairs and secretaries in information sharing.
- Discussion on the importance of feedback mechanisms for all members.
- Updates on the addition of the Growth and Marketing Committee to governance diagrams.
- Invitation for Jose Iadicicco to join the working group's Discord channel.
- Simo Simovic: Ensure all members have access to the working group's Discord channel and meeting minutes.
- Simo Simovic: Update governance diagrams to include the Growth and Marketing Committee.
Name
Attendance
Role
Yes
WG Lead/Secretary
Phil Lewis
No
ISC Member
Thiago Nunes
Yes
Interim ISC Member
Pedro Lucas
No
OSC Chair, Representing two Enterprise Members
Nicholas Cerny
Yes
Civics Committee Chair
Vaibhav S
Yes
GMC Member
Naushad Fouze
No
Product Committee
Jose Iadicicco
No
Community Member
Maureen Wepngong
Yes
DRep
Terence McCutcheon
No
Intersect
Lorenzo Bruno
Yes
Head of Product Curation
Recording: Intersect Governance WG Weekly - 2025/06/05 16:00 CEST - Recording
Transcript: Intersect Governance WG Weekly - 2025/06/05 16:00 CEST - Transcript
Update from last week
Recommendations Discussion
Discussion Point
Notes
Actions: Responsible / Note
Review of Previous Actions
The group reviewed the miro board from the previous meeting, which identified issues with the election process. The main problem statement focused on preventing vote buying and ensuring unique member accounts.
N/A
Proposed Solutions for Election Issues
The group discussed various solutions, including: * Limiting participation to registered members. * Implementing a web3 identity solution. * Tracking member participation. * Changing bylaws to limit individual memberships. * Requiring members to register for the election. * Adding a comment/rationale for vote choices. * Potentially requiring a certain ADA amount to participate. * Seeking endorsements for board applicants.
The group will prioritize solutions, focusing on web3 identity verification and requiring an extra action for board elections.
Atrium Integration
Gintama suggested using Atrium, a web3 tool, to track member activity and participation, potentially rewarding active members with XP and badges.
N/A
Next Steps and Action Items
The group discussed the process for moving forward with the proposed solutions, including internal review, ISC approval, and board feedback.
Simo and Lorenzo will draft a document outlining the solutions for review by the working group. The working group will review and agree on the proposed solutions before presenting them to the ISC.
Committees Update
ISC Actions/Update from last week
Committee Funding after TW
Clarifying the Scope and Expectations of Oversight by committees on Funded Proposals
AOB & Meeting Close
Additional Attendees:
Kyle Solomon - Observer
Thiago Nunes - Observer
Elaine Kardennis - Observer
Open Source Committee: Developer Advocates program received 30 sign-ups. Ecosystem development report planning underway with external technical partner.
Technical Steering Committee: Engaged with Product and GMC committees on the 2030 Vision. Monitoring for potential intra-era hard fork.
Budget Committee: Planning for a budget retrospective and a more inclusive 2026 process. DReps and community involvement emphasized, with kickoff expected in two weeks.
Product Committee: Canada and Rare workshops planned. Outreach to businesses building on Cardano to inform long-term vision continues.
Civics Committee: OKR workshops concluded; concrete recommendations expected shortly.
Clarification needed on whether Intersect’s role is to manage the ecosystem-wide budget or only for its own members.
Feedback invited via Discord post. Workshops and consultations to follow.
Transition of one consultant underway with no direct replacement.
Hiring expected to begin for community-facing roles with Cardano-native profiles.
Smart contract framework approved; audits by MLAB and TXPipe pending.
Oversight committee of five entities to verify fund disbursement accuracy.
No unilateral actions allowed within the contract permission structure.
Even if Intersect’s budget proposal is not approved, execution of the 39 funded proposals is secured.
Full contingency plan still in development.
Governance working group recommendations accepted by the board with two changes:
Six-month continuous membership required to participate.
Membership clock resets if renewal occurs after 6+ months of lapse.
Four board seats will be up for election in October, with mixed one- and two-year terms based on vote count.
The process seen as a successful demonstration of bottom-up governance coordination.
Only Product and Open Source Committees currently have dedicated budgets.
Other committees may submit proposals or request ad hoc funding, but no structured framework exists yet.
Desire for predictable funding access and clarity around stipend models for committee participation.
Budget Committee to finalize retro plan and kickoff structure, ensuring broad participation.
All members encouraged to comment on the Discord post regarding Intersect’s budgeting role.
Governance Working Group to reconvene this week to determine next topics (e.g., committee application processes, decision-making frameworks).
Board/Exec Team to document and share the consultant transition plan and hiring roadmap.
Intersect team to finalize and publicly document the smart contract deployment process and oversight configuration.
Board to complete and publish the contingency plan for Intersect’s budget failure scenario.
Committees without budgets to outline potential initiatives requiring funding and share them with the ISC.
Committees Update
ISC Actions/Update from last week
ED hiring panel nomination
AOB & Meeting Close
Adam Rusch - Member of the Board
Megan Hess - Vice Chair for Budget Committee
Thiago Nunes - Observer
Markus Gufler - TSC Elected Member
Technical Steering Committee (TSC) The TSC discussed re-establishing the hard fork working group, parameter topics such as slot battles and execution cost changes, and security council matters including a bug bounty proposal. The committee highlighted its lack of direct budget and raised the issue of how to cover governance action deposits. Clarification was provided that deposits for committee-backed governance actions can be supported through existing processes with board approval.
Product Committee Workshops continue across Asia as part of the Cardano 2030 strategy process. Sessions in Singapore and Osaka refined the draft vision, with further workshops scheduled in Japan. Engagement levels have been strong, with participants returning for deeper discussions.
Community Member Update Community participants acknowledged recent progress, highlighting successful workshops and growing positivity across Asia, including well-attended events and engagement with the broader ecosystem.
Open Source Committee (OSC) Q4 events have been selected for impact and networking value. The committee is trialing a new payment platform to streamline the Maintainer Retainer Program and other program payments, aiming to address challenges with recurring contributor compensation. Interviews for MRP participants will begin soon.
Budget Committee Questions for DReps regarding the 2026 budget process have been translated into Japanese and are being shared for feedback. The committee is awaiting formal board approval to move forward but is continuing with data collection in the meantime.
Membership & Community Committee (MCC) Work continues on refining member benefits. A working group is finalizing proposals for changes and updates, with an update expected in the coming weeks.
Civics Committee The CIP-149 grant program has been launched, offering up to 100,000 ADA in total to support wallet providers and governance tools integrating features for donating staking rewards to DReps.
The AMM survey was published last week and will remain open for six weeks, with results to be presented at the AMM in November.
The Committee Reward Policy is under review by a US legal team. If no major changes are required, it will be implemented; otherwise, revisions will be shared with ISC.
ISC members were reminded to review and provide feedback on the decision-making process documentation and BPMN diagram shared previously.
The process for selecting the next Executive Director was outlined.
Nominations: Both self-nominations and external nominations are open for three weeks.
Sentiment Gathering: Members and DReps will be able to rank candidates, producing two parallel lists.
Selection Panel: Will include two ISC representatives, two DReps, two staff members, and board participation. The panel will review materials, conduct interviews, and forward the top three candidates to the board.
Board Role: The board retains fiduciary responsibility and final decision-making authority. If the candidate pool is unsatisfactory, the process may be extended or restarted. ISC members were invited to self-nominate for panel participation, secretary will follow up via Discord, to make sure we have ISC participant selected.
Committee elections are open, but participation remains low. At the time of the meeting, only seven candidates had applied across three committees, leaving several with no applicants, including ISC (which has two open seats). Members were encouraged to promote applications actively within their networks. Flexibility was noted in extending application deadlines if needed, though the preference remains to conclude ahead of the holiday season.
Concerns were raised about the visibility of applications and the need for clearer communications to encourage candidates.
Members discussed the importance of defining committee roles and remit more clearly to attract quality applicants and ensure committees have real influence rather than symbolic roles.
Suggestions were made to standardize committee charters while preserving flexibility for different committee functions.
Broader reflections acknowledged the challenges of organizational transition but emphasized the significant impact committees can already have, citing protocol change recommendations as an example.
ISC Members: Review decision-making documentation; Nominate 5 ISC representatives for ED panel.
Committees Update
ISC Actions/Update from last week
Budget Committee Survey (Intersect Role)
Committee Stipend
AOB & Meeting Close
Additional Attendees:
Kyle Solomon - Vice-chair of Product Committee
Elaine Cardenas - Vice-chair of OSC
Thiago Nunes - Observer
Adam Rusch - Board member
Chairs provided updates from their respective committees:
Budget Committee announced plans for multiple events during Rare Evo to collect feedback and improve the next budget cycle. High participation was encouraged to ensure community engagement and better process design.
Open Source Committee (OSC) is refining roles and responsibilities among elected members and aligning them with budget workstreams. Plans were shared to introduce a “contributor status” for non-elected participants who are actively involved, and to explore more open, community-facing calls.
Membership & Community Committee (MCC) is working on a roadmap and remit revisions, but had no major updates to share this week.
Civics Committee has launched two new working groups: one on governance health and another on governance education. These groups will be open and less bureaucratic, aiming to build momentum from within the committee.
Product Committee is consolidating inputs from past workshops into a streamlined vision and strategy document. The committee is also seeking greater participation from underrepresented regions, with planned outreach in Africa and further community engagement during upcoming events in Asia.
Sheldon Hunt shared an overview of major blockchain events taking place across Asia later this year. These include WebX Japan, Korea Blockchain Week, Token 2049 in Singapore, and Tech for Impact Summit in Japan. These events are seen as key touchpoints for community engagement and representation, particularly in regions with active Cardano communities. Sheldon emphasized the opportunity for Intersect and committee members to have “boots on the ground” and build stronger regional ties.
Decision-Making Framework: A BPMN diagram is being developed to illustrate the proposal and decision workflow within Intersect. Discussions are ongoing within the Governance Working Group, with the aim to present a finalized version to ISC for review in the coming weeks.
Unfunded Committee Support Plan: To be addressed in August; no progress was reported yet.
Intersect Identity: This topic, raised in prior meetings, is being integrated into the upcoming Rare Evo agenda and the survey presented in this meeting.
Board Participation: The ISC was informed that board members are optionally invited to attend ISC calls. The presence of a board representative at this meeting was noted.
A detailed walkthrough of the draft Intersect Member Survey was presented. The survey is intended to gather structured feedback from Intersect members on budgeting priorities, Intersect’s role, and governance engagement. It includes:
Quantitative Questions: Covering funding priorities, Intersect’s impact, treasury management, and budgeting timeline preferences.
Qualitative Questions: Seeking open-ended feedback on budgeting, process improvements, and Intersect’s role in governance.
Foundational Questions (added after ISC feedback): Aimed at capturing members' understanding of budgeting, treasury draws, and definitions of executive function.
Concerns were raised about the clarity of terms like "executive function" and suggestions were made to either clarify or remove them to avoid confusion. There was general agreement on the need to balance depth with accessibility to ensure sufficient response rates.
The survey will be finalized by Wednesday, 30 July, ahead of Rare Evo, and all ISC members were encouraged to review and comment before then.
An update was shared regarding the Intersect Member Area:
NFTs will be issued to Intersect members, including a special edition for Rare Evo attendees.
Beta versions of the Member Area are now available in Spanish and Japanese, with special thanks to contributors who assisted with translations.
A full presentation on these updates is scheduled for the upcoming Intersect Town Hall on Thursday.
An agenda item on the committee stipend was deferred to the next ISC meeting due to time constraints.
ISC members to review and provide feedback on the Budget committee survey by Wednesday, 30 July.
Governance WG to revisit committee stipend design based on historical documents and past advisory recommendations.
Meeting Introduction
Change in Executive team
ISC Actions/Update from last week
Intersect Committee Elections - Progress Update
Update from Business Function and Committees (If Any)
AOB & Meeting Close
Additional Attendees:
Kyle Solomon - Observer
A temporary redistribution of responsibilities was noted, including support for the budget process and contract coordination. A workshop with the back-office team was scheduled to support this transition.
The Technical Steering Committee (TSC) requested clarification regarding the budget process and the use of smart contracts, specifically around payment oversight and veto power. It was explained that milestone reviews would occur before payment windows and that an oversight body would have the ability to pause payments if necessary.
There was a proposal to publish a temporary organizational chart to reflect leadership transitions while a permanent executive director is being recruited. The chart would aim to clarify internal roles and enhance community understanding of the organizational structure.
The idea of electing an interim ISC chair was raised. Clarification was sought on how leadership changes relate to member-raised concerns about the budget process. The board acknowledged these concerns and indicated that they would be addressed at the upcoming board meeting.
The committee discussed what might occur if Intersect’s budget proposal is not approved. One possibility is that Intersect may act solely as a contract administrator. It was questioned whether entities naming Intersect in their submissions would remain bound to that structure.
Concerns were raised regarding potential manipulation of elections due to the current bylaw structure (e.g., use of multiple accounts). An external audit is in place for the ongoing elections. Members agreed that the bylaws must be revised ahead of the next election cycle in October.
A reminder was shared to track all meeting actions using project management tools, such as ClickUp, and to maintain visibility on outstanding items across meetings.
A proposal was introduced to consider extending committee mandates to two years to encourage long-term planning and consistency. This topic will be brought to the Intersect Governance Working Group for further discussion.
Provide a briefing to the TSC on the budget process and smart contract implications.
Create and publish a temporary organizational chart, acknowledging its transitional nature.
Develop a contingency plan if the Intersect budget proposal is not approved.
Ensure action items are tracked in ClickUp with due dates.
ISC Actions/Update from last week
Smart Contract Testing
Draft Decision Making Framework
Update from Committees and Business Functions (If Any)
AOB & Meeting Close
Additional Attendees:
Kyle Solomon - Observer
Thiago Nunes - Observer
The meeting began with a welcome to all participants, including the newly elected chair of the Budget Committee. The ISC secretary outlined the agenda, which included a review of current action items, updates on budget implementation and treasury withdrawals, presentation of the draft decision-making framework, and committee-related updates.
Several ongoing items were reviewed.
The consultant transition plan has been finalized and will be presented to the board later this month.
The ISC confirmed its participation as observers in the upcoming board meeting scheduled for June 26, with preparations underway.
Upcoming Intersect AMA is scheduled for June 27. The process and agenda are finalized, marking the first in a recurring series aimed at increasing transparency and engagement with the broader community.
The leadership team is working on a contingency plan in case the 2025 budget is not approved. While the budget vote passed successfully, a formal fallback process is being documented, and will be brought to the ISC and board for review in early July.
Following the successful passage of the 2025 Intersect budget through on-chain governance, attention has turned to execution. Smart contract development and testing—conducted by Sundae Labs—is proceeding well. Internal and mainnet testing is underway with the goal of submitting all 39 individual treasury withdrawal actions at the start of the next epoch.
The team clarified that while some funded vendors are ready to begin work, contracts must be finalized and signed before formal onboarding. Roughly 70 to 80 contracts are expected to be issued in this initial cycle.
The ISC discussed the idea of issuing a prioritization guide to help DReps and ICC identify which proposals are particularly time-sensitive (e.g. Intersect operations, Catalyst administration, and Cardano Summit logistics). While this would not affect the order of submission, it could provide helpful context during voting and oversight.
Intersect staff presented a draft of the decision-making framework intended to clarify how decisions move through the governance structure—from working groups to committees, through the ISC, and where appropriate, to the board or wider community.
The framework categorizes different types of decisions: internal operational matters, governance actions, and externally-facing proposals. It aims to describe existing processes, not introduce new bureaucracy. Emphasis was placed on balancing standardization with committee autonomy, and avoiding bottlenecks.
The ISC agreed the framework should be tested using real-world examples and refined through an upcoming workshop. There was consensus that this process can support long-term clarity and institutional memory without slowing down day-to-day decision-making.
Several members raised the need to ensure early execution of critical proposals, particularly those that enable broader ecosystem activity or provide alternative funding pathways (e.g., Catalyst and Builder DAO). Delays in these areas could have downstream impacts. The ISC acknowledged this and reiterated the importance of agility and preparedness in future funding cycles.
It was noted that the Budget Committee is planning a retrospective to review this cycle’s process and gather feedback from all stakeholders. This may be conducted in part during community events such as Rare Evo.
Submit 39 individual treasury withdrawals in one coordinated batch.
Coordinate ISC observer participation in the June Intersect Board meeting.
Refine and test the decision-making framework in a practical workshop setting.
No
Secretary
N
Jack Briggs
Yes
Interim Executive Director
Y
Nick Cook
No
Director - Operations (Interim)
Y
YUTA
No
Community Member Seat
Y
Phil Lewis
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Sheldon Hunt
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Fred Tanaka
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Pedro Lucas
Yes
OSC Chair
Y
Samuel Leathers
Yes
Product Chair
Y
Darlington Welsh
Yes
MCC Chair
Y
Kristijan Kowalsky
Yes
CBC Chair
Y
Kevin Hammond
Yes
TSC Chair
Y
Wes Parkison
No
GMC Chair
Y
Nicolas Cerny
Yes
Interim CCC Chair
Y
Christian Taylor
No
Head of OSO
N
Lorenzo Bruno
Yes
Head of Product
N
Matt Davis
No
Head of Tech Operation
N
Duncan Soutar
Yes
Secretary of TSC
N
Lloyd Duhon
Yes
Secretary of Budget Committee
N
Larisa Mcfarlane
No
Secretary of CCC
N
Terence McCutcheon
Yes
Secretary of OSC
N
Name
Attendance
Role
Voting Seat (Y/N)
No
Secretary
N
Jack Briggs
Yes
Interim Executive Director
Y
Nick Cook
No
Director - Operations (Interim)
Y
YUTA
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Phil Lewis
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Sheldon Hunt
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Fred Tanaka
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Elaine Cardenas
Yes
OSC Chair
Y
Samuel Leathers
No
Product Chair
Y
Darlington Welsh
Yes
MCC Chair
Y
Kristijan Kowalsky
No
CBC Chair
Y
Kevin Hammond
No
TSC Chair
Y
Wes Parkison
No
GMC Chair
Y
Nicolas Cerny
No
CCC Chair
Y
Christian Taylor
No
Head of OSO
N
Lorenzo Bruno
Yes
Head of Product
N
Matt Davis
No
Head of Tech Operation
N
Tim Richmond
No
Head of Comms
N
Lloyd Duhon
Yes
Secretary of Budget Committee
N
Larisa Mcfarlane
Yes
Secretary of CCC
N
Terence McCutcheon
Yes
Secretary of OSC
N
Name
Attendance
Role
Voting Seat (Y/N)
Yes
Secretary
N
Jack Briggs
Yes
Interim Executive Director
Y
Nick Cook
No
Director - Operations (Interim)
Y
YUTA
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Phil Lewis
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Sheldon Hunt
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Fred Tanaka
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Pedro Lucas
Yes
OSC Chair
Y
Samuel Leathers
Yes
Product Chair
Y
Darlington Welsh
Yes
MCC Chair
Y
Kristijan Kowalsky
Yes
CBC Chair
Y
Kevin Hammond
Yes
TSC Chair
Y
Wes Parkison
No
GMC Chair
Y
Nicolas Cerny
Yes
Interim CCC Chair
Y
Christian Taylor
Yes
Head of OSO
N
Lorenzo Bruno
Yes
Head of Product
N
Matt Davis
No
Head of Tech Operation
N
Tim Richmond
No
Head of Comms
N
Duncan Soutar
Yes
Secretary of TSC
N
Lloyd Duhon
Yes
Secretary of Budget Committee
N
Larisa Mcfarlane
No
Secretary of CCC
N
Terence McCutcheon
No
Secretary of OSC
N
Name
Attendance
Role
Voting Seat (Y/N)
Yes
Secretary
N
Jack Briggs
No
Director of Ecosystem
Y
Nick Cook
Yes
Head of Membership & Community Hubs
Y
YUTA
No
Community Member Seat
Y
Phil Lewis
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Thiago Nunes
Yes
Interim Community Member Seat
Y
Pedro Lucas
No
OSC Chair
Y
Samuel Leathers
Yes
Product Chair
Y
Darlington Welsh
No
MCC Chair
Y
Prof. Steven
Yes
Chair of Board of Directors and CBC Chair
Y
Kevin Hammond
Yes
TSC Chair
Y
Seomon
Yes
GMC Chair
Y
Jose Miguel De Gamboa
Yes
CCC Chair
Y
Christian Taylor
No
Head of OSO
N
Lorenzo Bruno
No
Head of Product
N
Yes
Head of Tech Operation
N
Duncan Soutar
Yes
Secretary of TSC
N
Lloyd Duhon
Yes
Secretary of Budget Committee
N
Larisa Mcfarlane
Yes
Secretary of CCC
N
Terence McCutcheon
Yes
Secretary of OSC
N
Name
Attendance
Role
Voting Seat (Y/N)
Yes
Secretary
N
Jack Briggs
Yes
Interim Executive Director
Y
Nick Cook
No
Director - Operations (Interim)
Y
YUTA
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Phil Lewis
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Sheldon Hunt
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Fred Tanaka
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Pedro Lucas
Yes
OSC Chair
Y
Samuel Leathers
Yes
Product Chair
Y
Darlington Welsh
Yes
MCC Chair
Y
Kristijan Kowalsky
Yes
CBC Chair
Y
Kevin Hammond
No
TSC Chair
Y
Wes Parkison
No
GMC Chair
Y
Nicolas Cerny
Yes
Interim CCC Chair
Y
Christian Taylor
Yes
Head of OSO
N
Lorenzo Bruno
Yes
Head of Product
N
Matt Davis
Yes
Head of Tech Operation
N
Duncan Soutar
Yes
Secretary of TSC
N
Lloyd Duhon
No
Secretary of Budget Committee
N
Larisa Mcfarlane
Yes
Secretary of CCC
N
Terence McCutcheon
Yes
Secretary of OSC
N
ISC Actions/Update from last week
Chair Election Discussion
Update from Committees (If Any)
AOB & Meeting Close
Name
Attendance
Role
Voting Seat (Y/N)
Yes
Secretary
N
Jack Briggs
Yes
Interim Executive Director
Y
Nick Cook
Yes
Director - Operations (Interim)
Y
YUTA
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Phil Lewis
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Sheldon Hunt
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Fred Tanaka
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Pedro Lucas
Yes
OSC Chair
Y
Samuel Leathers
No
Product Chair
Y
Darlington Welsh
Yes
MCC Chair
Y
TBD
No
CBC Chair
Y
Kevin Hammond
Yes
TSC Chair
Y
Simon Fleck
Yes
Interim GMC Chair
Y
Nicolas Cerny
Yes
Interim CCC Chair
Y
Christian Taylor
Yes
Head of OSO
N
Lorenzo Bruno
Yes
Head of Product
N
Matt Davis
No
Head of Tech Operation
N
Duncan Soutar
Yes
Secretary of TSC
N
Lloyd Duhon
Yes
Secretary of Budget Committee
N
Larisa Mcfarlane
Yes
Secretary of CCC
N
Terence McCutcheon
Yes
Secretary of OSC
N
Additional Attendees:
Thiago Nunes - Observer
The meeting opened with a review of attendance and the agenda. It was noted that some committee chair positions remain vacant and elections are in progress. The ISC secretary outlined the agenda, which included updates on action items, discussion of the ISC chair role, committee updates, and any other business members wished to raise.
The committee reviewed several key developments:
New Committee Roles & Decision-Making Framework: There was broad agreement on the need for a clear, documented process outlining how ideas and proposals move from working groups through committees and onward to governance actions. Intersect staff will draft a comprehensive framework—including a visual mapping—to be shared in two weeks.
Consultant Transition Plan: The board approved the proposed consultant transition plan, with rollout scheduled for July. While this change will affect some areas such as budget administration, teams are preparing to ensure a smooth transition. The Intersect team and ISC will finalize a draft of the plan and take it to the June board meeting for ratification and implementation.
Monthly AMA Meeting: The first AMA meeting is scheduled for the end of June. Lara and the intersect team are preparing for the first AMA meeting.
New Election Tool Onboarding & Elections: The new election tool is currently being piloted with select committees. Feedback from these initial elections will guide further improvements. Use of the tool is encouraged but remains optional. Committees may choose alternative processes if they prefer.
The board is now meeting weekly with the executive team and has invited ISC members to attend the next board meeting in June to improve alignment and communication.
A legal workshop was held to review Intersect’s role as administrator, covering contractual responsibilities, internal procedures, and the phased rollout of the smart contract framework (July–December). The technical audit reported minimal issues. The need for clearer guidelines on transparency and vendor milestone reporting was discussed.
A presentation summarizing legal considerations will be shared with the ISC next week. An updated description of the administrator role has been published in the knowledge base.
The committee revisited whether a permanent ISC chair is necessary. One perspective supported remaining chairless with representation on an as-needed basis. Another suggested appointing a chair to improve external visibility and communication.
A motion was raised and passed that the committee will nominate representatives on an as-needed basis rather than electing a permanent chair. The secretary will continue to drive meetings.
The ISC explored how working groups should operate when spanning multiple committees. It was agreed that groups should maintain flexibility while being anchored to a primary committee for clarity and accountability. Excessive bureaucracy should be avoided to encourage active participation.
A draft of the decision-making framework will be shared in two weeks.
The legal/admin process deck will be presented at the next ISC meeting.
ISC representation will be coordinated for the June board meeting.
Administration Deck to be shared with Kevin (pass it to the TSC)
Solutions for tracking documentation updates on Intersect knowledge base will be investigated and tested.
Name
Attendance
Role
Yes
WG Lead/Secretary
Phil Lewis
Yes
ISC Member
Thiago Nunes
Yes
Interim ISC Member
Pedro Lucas
No
OSC Chair, Representing two Enterprise Members
Nicholas Cerny
Yes
Civics Committee Chair
Vaibhav S
Yes
GMC Member
Naushad Fouze
Yes
Product Committee
Jose Iadicicco
Yes
Community Member
Maureen Wepngong
Yes
DRep
Terence McCutcheon
Yes
Intersect
Tevo Saks
No
Community Member
Lorenzo Bruno
Tes
Recording: Intersect Governance WG Weekly - 2025/06/12 15:59 CEST - Recording
Transcript: Intersect Governance WG Weekly - 2025/06/12 15:59 CEST - Transcript
Update from last week
Recommendations Discussion
Discussion Point
Notes
Actions: Responsible / Note
Vulnerability in Board Elections (Vote Buying/Multiple Memberships)
This issue presents a significant risk, particularly given the upcoming board election introducing four new community seats. The low cost of entry (approximately $4k per seat) could enable malicious actors to gain substantial influence. It was acknowledged during discussions that improving the election process promptly is essential to mitigate this risk ahead of the October election.
The working group will finalize the proposed recommendations to address this vulnerability.
Problem Statement Definition
Initial problem statements were deemed insufficiently clear. Emphasis was placed on articulating the core risk concisely. The agreed core risk is: "A majority of the board could be held by nefarious actors, rendering Intersect unworkable or allowing them to act against the organization's interests."
The presentation slides will be updated to clearly articulate the revised problem statement and highlight the severe/possible risk assessment.
Proposed Solutions & Risk Mitigation
Various solutions were discussed, including: * Avoiding the risk: Reducing the number of community seats elected in October from four to two, maintaining the founding members' majority for now. This would be a temporary measure to buy time for more robust solutions. * Reducing the likelihood: Implementing KYC/web3 identity verification to prevent multiple memberships. Tracking member participation for eligibility (e.g., membership duration, activity levels). Requiring an extra action (e.g., rationale) to vote in board elections. Changing bylaws to restrict individual multiple memberships. * Accepting the risk: Relying solely on the existing audit process as a contingency, with the understanding that the current audit cannot fully detect or prevent vote buying due to lack of identity verification and bylaws. This approach was largely dismissed as insufficient.
A poll will be conducted on the Discord channel for the motion to elect only two new community seats in October, delaying the other two until April. If the motion passes, this will be presented as the primary recommendation to the ISC. The working group will continue to develop other risk mitigation strategies (KYC/web3 identity, participation tracking, bylaws changes) as secondary recommendations, presenting them as "things we're working on" to the ISC.
Simo will create the Discord poll for the primary motion, tagging eligible voting members. The group will reconvene next week to discuss additional recommendations if the primary motion passes or not.
Committees Update
ISC Actions/Update from last week
Board election question overview
Committee Member Dismissal Policy
New Updates Section Demo
AOB & Meeting Close
Additional Attendees:
Kyle Solomon - Vice-chair of Product Committee
Elaine Cardenas - Vice-chair of OSC
Thiago Nunes - Observer
Open Source Committee is relaunching the Developer Advocates program with a focus on higher quality and broader outreach. Increased internal engagement and frequent work sessions were noted.
Civics Committee has finalized its recommendation for submitting the updated Constitutional Committee governance action in epoch 572 (July 23–28). A roadmap for 2025 is also in development.
Technical Steering Committee (TSC) is working to improve coordination with technical working groups and increase community participation. Coordination challenges around hard forks and broader technical input were highlighted.
Budget Committee is exploring public access to meetings, possibly including live streaming. A recent internal retrospective workshop was seen as positive and in alignment with previously set timelines.
Governance and Marketing Committee (GMC) emphasized applying lessons learned from the previous budget cycle. Plans are in motion for targeted working groups (e.g., enterprise), and the committee will host sessions during Cardano’s Developer & Governance Day at Rare Evo.
Decision-Making Framework: No recent work due to focus on board election priorities. Still on the Governance WG agenda.
Consultant Transition Plan: Approved by the Board; one consultant is rolling off. Item marked as complete.
Treasury Withdrawals (39 actions): Final checks and mainnet deployment were underway during the meeting. Tests involving the oversight committee were expected to complete that day, with submission to the chain anticipated the following day (pending no blockers). Questions were raised about the feasibility of this timeline, but the process was on track.
Oversight Committee Clarification
Clarification was provided that the oversight committee comprises five third-party entities (Cardano Foundation, Sundae Labs, Dquadrant, Xerberus, and NMKR). These organizations ensure Intersect executes disbursements according to approved governance actions.
Several concerns were raised regarding transparency, potential conflicts of interest, and the role (or lack thereof) of internal committees in this oversight process. Further clarity was requested around how technical and open-source committees intersect (or don't) with oversight roles.
Future of Intersect Discussion
A broader discussion is underway regarding the long-term role of Intersect. Points raised included the need for deeper member involvement in strategic decision-making and budget planning.
It was noted that further input from the executive team and board is required to determine next steps.
A new draft application process and question set for board candidates was presented by the Intersect election team.
The structure includes sections on understanding Intersect, the Cardano community, board duties, and a candidate declaration letter.
ISC members were invited to review and comment by the end of the week, with the aim to finalize and share the proposal with the Board.
Additional community-facing education (e.g., X Spaces) is planned to help members understand the role of the Board and the weight of the election.
A suggestion was made to require a minimum number of endorsements from existing Intersect members to filter low-effort applications.
A policy to formalize committee member engagement and dismissal for inactivity was approved by vote.
The policy includes:
Secretaries tracking inactivity at 4, 5, and 6 weeks.
Option for resignation or a vote of no confidence after 8 weeks of non-participation.
Notification and offboarding procedures.
The policy applies narrowly to non-participation; behavioral or disruptive issues would be handled via existing code of conduct procedures.
The policy passed with strong support (1 abstention; 8 in favor). Implementation will begin immediately, with the Board and committee secretaries to be informed.
An agenda item on the new update section demo was deferred to the next ISC meeting due to time constraints.
Committees to review and comment on the board election application draft by end of the week.
Dismissal policy to be published and secretaries to begin internal tracking immediately.
Intersect team to confirm final execution of treasury withdrawals and provide updates to ISC.
Oversight committee clarification item to be closed, it will be open again for further discussion if needed.
The topic of Intersect's strategic role to be escalated for input from the executive team and board.
ISC Actions/Update from last week
ISC–Budget Task Force Coordination
Consultant transition plan
Update from Committees and Business Function (If Any)
AOB & Meeting Close
The meeting opened with a review of the agenda, including ClickUp action items, an update on ICS–Budget Task Force coordination, and a deep dive into the Consultant Transition Plan. Nicolas Cerny as new interim chair of the Civics Committee was welcomed.
The interim organizational chart was published on the knowledge base. We can expect some changes in the next couple of months as we go through the transition phase.
The committee roles document received feedback. A workshop will be organized to further clarify decision flows and governance actions.
A public blog and documentation package on smart contracts and Intersect’s role as an administrator were released. Smart contract auditing is still in progress.
The first Leadership AMA is scheduled for late June, modeled after SPO calls, with a focus on direct community engagement and actionable follow-up.
ISC voting members were invited to participate in Budget Task Force meetings on Wednesdays and Fridays. This aims to improve transparency, provide timely input, and establish stronger involvement in both the current budget cycle and the upcoming retrospective and planning process for 2026.
A comprehensive plan to transition Intersect from reliance on external consultants to full-time hires was presented:
Timeline: The plan will begin in July, with a 14–15 week recruitment process per role. Some positions will begin being rolled off as early as June/July..
Scope: About 12 consultant roles are to be assessed. Each will have a corresponding job spec, and the ISC will review whether each role should be replaced, revised, or deprecated.
Process: Recruitment will include public postings, a multi-stage interview process, onboarding, and shadowing phases. Cost reduction and increased internal capacity are key goals.
Community Hiring: ISC members discussed the importance of sourcing talent from within the Cardano community. Ranges and transparency around salaries (without disclosing individual compensation) will be developed.
Audit & Assurance Clarifications:
The difference between delivery assurance and technical auditing was clarified. Delivery assurance staff need technical literacy but are not auditors.
For high-stakes proposals, vendors will be responsible for commissioning technical audits; Intersect may support connecting auditors or covering costs in some cases.
ISC members discussed whether new support roles should be created to help committees manage increased operational complexity.
Questions were raised about the future of existing committees (e.g. Civics, Growth & Marketing) in light of limited funding and evolving priorities.
It was acknowledged that Intersect may not continue leading in every domain; other MBOs (Member-Based Organizations) should be supported to spin out and take over key focus areas.
An idea was introduced to explore the creation of an MBO incubator or accelerator model, which could help emerging organizations bootstrap with initial funding and governance support.
The board is preparing to begin the Executive Director recruitment process in June.
The process will include community input and transparency. The current interim ED will submit a "manifesto-style" strategy document to inform candidates and support future planning.
A new voting tool was demonstrated that allows ISC and committee secretaries to conduct chair elections or any other formal votes asynchronously or live during meetings.
The tool supports customized election questions, role-based voting permissions, and public result display.
Committees are encouraged to adopt the tool, and onboarding support will be provided.
A previous action item related to the Board’s promised follow-up to the board meeting with ISC and other committees was revisited.
It was acknowledged that while a brief message and updated board minutes were shared, no formal response with next steps had been issued.
The matter will be re-added to the board meeting agenda to ensure this is properly addressed.
Organize a special workshop to clarify decision-making flow from committee recommendations to the board decision.
Add ISC voting members to Wednesday and Friday coordination meetings with the Budget Task Force.
Provide onboarding sessions and guidance for configuration and execution for the new election tool.
Name
Attendance
Role
Voting Seat (Y/N)
Yes
Secretary
N
Jack Briggs
No
Interim Executive Director
Y
Nick Cook
No
Director - Operations (Interim)
Y
YUTA
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Phil Lewis
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Sheldon Hunt
No
Community Member Seat
Y
Fred Tanaka
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Pedro Lucas
Yes
OSC Chair
Y
Samuel Leathers
No
Product Chair
Y
Darlington Welsh
Yes
MCC Chair
Y
Kristijan Kowalsky
Yes
CBC Chair
Y
Kevin Hammond
Yes
TSC Chair
Y
Wes Parkison
Yes
GMC Chair
Y
Nicolas Cerny
Yes
Interim CCC Chair
Y
Christian Taylor
Yes
Head of OSO
N
Lorenzo Bruno
Yes
Head of Product
N
Matt Davis
No
Head of Tech Operation
N
Tim Richmond
Yes
Head of Comms
N
Duncan Soutar
No
Secretary of TSC
N
Lloyd Duhon
Yes
Secretary of Budget Committee
N
Larisa Mcfarlane
Yes
Secretary of CCC
N
Terence McCutcheon
Yes
Secretary of OSC
N
Name
Attendance
Role
Voting Seat (Y/N)
Yes
Secretary
N
Jack Briggs
Yes
Interim Executive Director
Y
Nick Cook
No
Director - Operations (Interim)
Y
YUTA
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Phil Lewis
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Sheldon Hunt
No
Community Member Seat
Y
Fred Tanaka
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Pedro Lucas
Yes
OSC Chair
Y
Samuel Leathers
No
Product Chair
Y
Darlington Welsh
Yes
MCC Chair
Y
Prof. Steven
No
Chair of Board of Directors and CBC Chair
Y
Kevin Hammond
No
TSC Chair
Y
Simon Fleck
No
GMC Chair
Y
Nicolas Cerny
Yes
Interim CCC Chair
Y
Christian Taylor
Yes
Head of OSO
N
Lorenzo Bruno
Yes
Head of Product
N
Matt Davis
No
Head of Tech Operation
N
Duncan Soutar
No
Secretary of TSC
N
Lloyd Duhon
Yes
Secretary of Budget Committee
N
Larisa Mcfarlane
Yes
Secretary of CCC
N
Terence McCutcheon
No
Secretary of OSC
N
Kyle Solomon
No
Product Co-Chair
N
Meeting Introduction
ISC new elected members
ISC Actions/Update from last week
Contract Template
Update from Committees and Business Function (If Any)
AOB & Meeting Close
Name
Attendance
Role
Voting Seat (Y/N)
Yes
Secretary
N
Jack Briggs
Yes
Interim Executive Director
Y
Nick Cook
Yes
Director - Operations (Interim)
Y
YUTA
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Phil Lewis
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Sheldon Hunt
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Fred Tanaka
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Pedro Lucas
Yes
OSC Chair
Y
Samuel Leathers
Yes
Product Chair
Y
Darlington Welsh
Yes
MCC Chair
Y
Prof. Steven
No
Chair of Board of Directors and CBC Chair
Y
Kevin Hammond
Yes
TSC Chair
Y
Simon Fleck
No
GMC Chair
Y
Jose Miguel De Gamboa
Yes
CCC Chair
Y
Christian Taylor
Yes
Head of OSO
N
Lorenzo Bruno
Yes
Head of Product
N
Matt Davis
Yes
Head of Tech Operation
N
Duncan Soutar
Yes
Secretary of TSC
N
Lloyd Duhon
Yes
Secretary of Budget Committee
N
Larisa Mcfarlane
Yes
Secretary of CCC
N
Terence McCutcheon
Yes
Secretary of OSC
N
Kyle Solomon
Yes
Product Co-Chair
N
Additional Attendees:
Adam Rusch - Community Board Seat - Observer
Thiago Nunes - Community - Observer
The meeting opened with introductions from ISC members and representatives from various Intersect committees. Newly elected members participated for the first time, helping establish connections and shared context within the group.
A discussion was held around whether the ISC should elect a formal Chair or continue operating through shared facilitation. Members shared differing views regarding the benefits of structure versus informality. It was agreed that this discussion would be added as a formal item for the next meeting, where a decision could be made collectively.
a. Intersect Organizational Chart
An updated organizational chart was presented, reflecting the current team structure and consultant roles. Members requested that all known contributors be included in the public-facing version to ensure full transparency. This version is expected to be finalized and shared soon.
b. Consultant Transition Plan
An update on consultants' transition plan was shared, outlining a 12-month timeline to replace 12 consultant roles with full-time staff. The objective is to reduce dependency on external contractors while maintaining delivery continuity. The plan includes phased hiring and knowledge transfer. The plan to be finalized and presented to the ISC for discussion and feedback on the next ISC call.
c. Committee Roles Document
A draft document defining the roles and expectations of Intersect committees was introduced. Members were asked to review the draft and provide feedback. Once finalized, it will be published in the knowledge base to support onboarding and clarify committee mandates.
d. Delivery Assurance Concerns
Concerns were raised about the current capacity and visibility of the delivery assurance function. Discussion emphasized the need for more robust monitoring of funded projects, with a potential re-evaluation of how this function is staffed and prioritized.
The committee discussed the inconsistent use of clear, measurable deliverables in contract templates. There was a strong recommendation to improve milestone-based accountability for all funded work, particularly as treasury contract implementation ramps up.
It was noted that Intersect is currently listed as the administrator on 39 budget proposals. The implications of this designation were discussed, with a shared understanding that clear expectations, boundaries, and risk mitigation strategies are needed going forward.
The committee discussed a plan to avoid a single large withdrawal of 275M ADA from the treasury. Instead, a phased strategy was proposed, grouping similar proposals into themed withdrawals. This approach is intended to enhance transparency, reduce risk, and facilitate community communication.
Clarification was provided on audit expectations:
Delivery assurance audits monitor whether funded work is being executed.
Financial and technical audits focus on how funds are spent and whether deliverables meet quality standards.
Members noted the importance of specifying these requirements clearly in contracts and proposals.
Concerns were raised about Discord being overly cluttered and unstructured for decision-making. Members expressed interest in exploring more structured platforms for documentation and alternative voting tools that offer transparency and traceability.
Add Chair discussion to one of the next meeting agenda for resolution.
Finalize and publish updated interim Intersect org chart.
Share formal consultant transition plan with the ISC/add to agenda and allow enough time for discussion on the next ISC call
Circulate the committee roles document to the ISC for review and feedback so we can finalize the document
Establish ISC–Budget Task Force Coordination Meetings
Committees Update
ISC Actions/Update from last week
ISC Survey (Intersect Role & Identity)
Committee Stipend
AOB & Meeting Close
Budget Committee reported that the budget retrospective and future process survey was published and is open until 22 August. The committee is promoting the survey at Rare Evo and emphasized the importance of feedback from active Intersect members. The committee has also shifted from budget task force meetings to a single weekly session focused on improving the overall budget process. Additionally, the committee is in the process of selecting a new audit partner and is currently interviewing firms, including one of the Big Four.
Product Committee shared that the first draft of the Cardano 2030 Vision is now available on their GitHub. A workshop will be held at Rare Evo, with a follow-up remote session scheduled. Committee members and ISC participants were invited to provide comments via GitHub or attend the upcoming sessions.
Growth & Marketing Committee (GMC) released a community survey focused on future marketing strategy and budget expectations for 2026. The aim is to gather sentiment and direction from the broader ecosystem. The committee is also planning related outreach during Rare Evo.
A side discussion emerged around the roles and scope of GMC vs. Intersect’s comms team, clarifying that GMC has a broader mandate beyond Intersect, while the Intersect comms team focuses on internal and cross-committee coordination. Further alignment discussions were proposed to clarify boundaries and collaboration between the two.
Decision-Making Framework: Work is ongoing within the Governance Working Group. A BPMN diagram is being finalized by Intersect staff and will be shared for ISC review in the coming weeks.
Committee Funding for Unfunded Groups: Still pending; expected to be addressed by the Intersect team in mid-August.
Intersect Identity Discussion: Integrated into a newly proposed survey initiative led by ISC to gather member input on Intersect’s evolving role.
A new survey was proposed by an ISC member to gather feedback from Intersect members on the organization's identity, role, and committee structure. The context reflects changes made earlier this year - especially the shift in Intersect’s function from internal facilitation to broader ecosystem coordination.
The survey aims to understand whether members support continuing the expanded role or reverting to a more narrowly defined mandate. Proposed questions include:
Should Intersect continue acting as a budget facilitator for the whole ecosystem or refocus on internal priorities?
What role should committees play in defining budgets?
Is the current committee structure effective, or should it be revised?
Open-ended feedback from members on Intersect’s value and direction.
ISC members were invited to review and comment on the draft. As there was no quorum, no vote was taken. Members agreed to revisit the proposal next week to determine whether the ISC will formally adopt and distribute the survey.
The ISC revisited the committee stipend decision originally approved in November 2024. The policy provides for 500 ADA/month for committee members and 1,000 ADA/month for chairs, beginning once treasury withdrawals are executed.
Key discussion points included:
Start Date Ambiguity: Some members assumed the stipend would be backdated to January 2025, while others believed it should align with the current Intersect budget cycle (June 2025–June 2026).
Double Stipend Concerns: Questions were raised about members serving on multiple committees or holding elected seats on the ISC - whether they would be eligible for multiple stipends.
Equity & Workload Variation: Members noted unequal contributions across committees and recommended exploring a performance-based or contribution-weighted payout model. A proposal was made to allocate a portion of the stipend based on peer assessment.
Non-Elected Contributors: Several committees rely on active non-elected participants, and some members suggested future stipend discussions should consider recognizing their contributions as well.
The ISC agreed that while the original decision remains in place, a structured annual review is required. A follow-up process was proposed:
The Governance Working Group could host deeper discussions and return with recommendations.
A clear operational model (including roles, eligibility, and backdating policy) should be developed by Intersect staff.
A formal motion and possibly a special session will be needed if changes to the existing policy are pursued.
ISC members to review the proposed Intersect Identity & Role Survey and prepare feedback for discussion in the next meeting.
Committee stipend policy to remain a standing agenda item for follow-up. Continue discussion on this topic.
Name
Attendance
Role
Voting Seat (Y/N)
Yes
Secretary
N
Jack Briggs
No
Interim Executive Director
Y
Nick Cook
No
Director - Operations (Interim)
Y
YUTA
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Phil Lewis
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Sheldon Hunt
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Fred Tanaka
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Pedro Lucas
Yes
OSC Chair
Y
Samuel Leathers
No
Product Chair
Y
Darlington Welsh
Yes
MCC Chair
Y
Kristijan Kowalsky
Yes
CBC Chair
Y
Kevin Hammond
No
TSC Chair
Y
Wes Parkison
No
GMC Chair
Y
Nicolas Cerny
No
Interim CCC Chair
Y
Christian Taylor
Yes
Head of OSO
N
Lorenzo Bruno
Yes
Head of Product
N
Matt Davis
No
Head of Tech Operation
N
Tim Richmond
Yes
Head of Comms
N
Duncan Soutar
No
Secretary of TSC
N
Lloyd Duhon
No
Secretary of Budget Committee
N
Larisa Mcfarlane
No
Secretary of CCC
N
Terence McCutcheon
Yes
Secretary of OSC
N
Committees Update
ISC Actions/Update from last week
Budget Process 2026 Proposal
Committee Election Update
AOB & Meeting Close
Name
Attendance
Role
Voting Seat (Y/N)
Yes
Secretary
N
Jack Briggs
Yes
Interim Executive Director
Y
Nick Cook
Yes
Director - Operations (Interim)
Y
YUTA
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Phil Lewis
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Sheldon Hunt
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Fred Tanaka
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Elaine Cardenas
No
OSC Chair
Y
Samuel Leathers
No
Product Chair
Y
Darlington Welsh
Yes
MCC Chair
Y
Kristijan Kowalsky
Yes
CBC Chair
Y
Kevin Hammond
No
TSC Chair
Y
Wes Parkison
Yes
GMC Chair
Y
Nicolas Cerny
Yes
CCC Chair
Y
Christian Taylor
Yes
Head of OSO
N
Lorenzo Bruno
Yes
Head of Product
N
Matt Davis
No
Head of Tech Operation
N
Tim Richmond
No
Head of Comms
N
Lloyd Duhon
Yes
Secretary of Budget Committee
N
Larisa Mcfarlane
Yes
Secretary of CCC
N
Terence McCutcheon
Yes
Secretary of OSC
N
Adam Rusch - Member of the Board
Adam Dean - Vice Chair of TSC
Megan Hess - Vice Chair of Budget Committee
Kyle Solomon - Vice Chair of Product Committee
Valeria Devaux - Observer
Thiago Nunes - Observer
Civics Committee Reported strong participation in a recent X Space session and receipt of the first applications for the CIP-149 grant (optional DRep compensation). The first meeting of the Constitutional Amendment Working Group is scheduled this week. Coordination with Intersect communications will support broader awareness and outreach for the working group launch.
Product Committee Provided updates from workshops held across Asia (Singapore, Osaka, Tokyo), where a shared draft version of the Cardano 2030 Vision has been reached. The updated draft will be reviewed by the committee and published shortly. Additional remote and regional workshops are planned, including one later this week. The goal remains to have the Vision info action submitted on-chain by the end of October, followed by continued work on the strategy and 2026 roadmap.
The Committee Rewards Policy has passed legal review without major changes. Only minor checks regarding taxation remain, expected to conclude by the end of the week. Implementation can begin once confirmation is received.
The ISC also reviewed participation in the Executive Director (ED) Panel. Three members have confirmed interest, and two additional nominees are still being sought. Final names will be sent to the Board next week.
Representatives from the Budget Committee presented the proposed 2026 Budget Process Roadmap, now approved by the Board and prepared for community dissemination.
Mandate: The process stems from the DRep-approved treasury withdrawal for Intersect, mandating the creation of a 2026 budget framework.
Structure: Five steps (Step 0–4) define the cycle:
Step 0: Current phase — gathering feedback and DRep ratification of the process before execution.
Step 1-4: Preparation, review, off-chain voting, proposal consolidation, and final on-chain approval.
Timeline Highlights:
Nov: Info action for budget process and six-month Net Change Limit (NCL) to be published.
Jan–Mar 2026: Proposal collection, off-chain DRep voting with a 67% approval threshold.
April: Consolidation and submission of the 2026 Budget Governance Action for DRep approval.
Key differences from last year include early DRep ratification, removal of redundant pre-pivot phases, and introduction of clearer templates for proposals. The NCL will be calculated based on actual ADA received, reducing uncertainty.
The committee emphasized coordination between the Budget and Product Committees, ensuring the roadmap aligns with the finalized Cardano Vision and Strategy. Discussion highlighted the potential for future multi-year (three- or five-year) budgeting to increase predictability and maturity across programs.
Members discussed how committees could be more directly involved in the 2026 budget process, suggesting roles as subject-matter experts and oversight bodies supporting DReps. The conversation also focused on improving strategic alignment between the budget, roadmap, and Cardano Vision; ensuring realistic committee funding levels; and assessing Intersect’s operational capacity to manage execution. It was agreed that clearer coordination between committees, DReps, and the executive team will be essential for efficiency and transparency in future budget cycles.
An update was provided on the 2025 Oct Committee Elections:
As of the meeting date, 17 candidates had applied, with the Budget Committee and TSC still lacking applicants.
The application deadline has been extended to 24 October to improve participation.
Members were encouraged to share the election announcement on social media. Templates and translated materials (Japanese, Portuguese, Spanish) will be circulated.
A new blog post highlighting committee benefits and impact is also planned.
Discussion acknowledged broader challenges with engagement and voting fatigue. Some members suggested two-year mandates for committees and a small operational fund sourced from membership fees for committees without budget coverage.
ED Selection Panel: Confirm two additional ISC representatives and forward final list to the Board.
Meeting Introduction
High Level Timeline (Budget Process) Membership Vote
2024 Intersect Financial Report
Update from Committee (If Any)
Intersect Committee Elections - Progress Update
Intersect Governance WG Charter Ratification
AOB & Meeting Close
Name
Attendance
Role
Voting Seat (Y/N)
Yes
Secretary
N
Jack Briggs
Yes
Director of Ecosystem
Y
Lawrence Clark
No
Head of Operation
Y
Nick Cook
Yes
Head of Membership & Community Hubs
Y
YUTA
No
Community Member Seat
Y
Phil Lewis
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Thiago Nunes
No
Interim Community Member Seat
Y
Pedro Lucas
Yes
OSC Chair
Y
Samuel Leathers
No
Product Chair
Y
Darlington Welsh
Yes
MCC Chair
Y
Prof. Steven
No
Chair of Board of Directors and CBC Chair
Y
Kevin Hammond
No
TSC Chair
Y
Seomon
Yes
GMC Chair
Y
Jose Miguel De Gamboa
Yes
CCC Chair
Y
Christian Taylor
Yes
Head of OSO
N
Lorenzo Bruno
Yes
Head of Product
N
No
Head of Tech Operation
N
Duncan Soutar
Yes
Secretary of TSC
N
Lloyd Duhon
Yes
Secretary of Budget Committee
N
Larisa Mcfarlane
No
Secretary of CCC
N
Terence McCutcheon
Yes
Secretary of OSC
N
Additional Attendees:
Valeria Devaux - Observer
The meeting began with an overview of the agenda and a brief update on the current state of affairs. The facilitator emphasized the importance of transparency, active listening, and incorporating community feedback into decision-making.
Participants discussed recent community feedback—including concerns raised via petitions—and how these issues impact governance processes. Emphasis was placed on improving communication and documentation to address concerns.
An update was provided on the 2025 Finance Intersect report. The final draft of the report, which was shared on Friday, is currently undergoing final legal checks to ensure compliance with Wyoming state regulations and IRS requirements. The intention is to submit the report on time for Wyoming and make it available later this week. This document is critical as it will serve as part of the context and resource base for the 2025 funding request, aligning roughly with the previous year's budget.
Several committee updates were discussed:
The Open Source Committee is finalizing its budget proposal and plans to submit it as soon as possible.
For MCC, Catalyst will submit its own budget proposal directly, and MCC is working to finalize and submit three budget line items by Wednesday to meet the overall deadline.
The Technical Steering Committee is also finalizing its budget proposal, with a target submission by Thursday or Friday to avoid delays in the overall process.
All committees are expected to meet the overall budget submission deadline on the 24th to allow ample time for review and feedback from the DRS and the broader community. The action for all committees is to submit their respective budget proposals via the designated submission portal.
Updates were provided on community seat applications and the challenges observed from previous elections, including issues related to the clarity of guidelines and potential vulnerabilities in the process. To address these concerns, the Intersect Governance working group has been tasked with drafting proposals for governance improvements. Once finalized, the updated documentation will be shared with committee members for further input.
A motion was introduced to ratify the charter for the Intersect Governance Working Group, which had been circulated to all members two weeks earlier. After a brief discussion allowing for any questions or objections, the charter was put to a vote. All seven voting members cast affirmative votes, resulting in unanimous ratification.
Prepare and distribute meeting notes via the knowledge base for broad accessibility.
Finalize Old vs Revised Budget Process Document and share it with Intersect Governance WG
Submit committees budget proposal via submission portal
Proposal Submission Portal - Progress Update
Intersect Committee Election - Progress Update
ISC Committee Voting Seats Discussion
Intersect Governance WG Charter
Committee Update - Risks & Issuses
Valeria Devaux - Observer
Adam Rush- Observer
Clarification provided on the budget submission process and deadlines.
The budget submission form will remain open:
Recommended submission deadline: March 31st (for committee review).
Final deadline: April 24th (for inclusion in the first budget information actions).
Discussion on the net change limit proposal and its potential impact on the 2025 budget.
Concerns raised about the constitutionality of the net change limit decision.
Update on the development of a new budget proposal tool within gov.tools.
Discussion on migrating existing budget proposals to the new tool.
Concerns about potential confusion among users due to the form change.
Clarification that the new tool will be accessible via the same URL as the existing form.
Update on committee elections, including:
Communication efforts.
Translation of application forms.
Xspace sessions.
Application period is officially open until April 4th.
Discussion on clarifying voting rights within the ISC, particularly for committee chairs and functional heads.
Decision: Voting rights granted to:
Community member seats
Committee chairs
Executive team
Clarification on the composition of community member seats and upcoming elections.
Agreement to publish ISC meeting minutes in the Knowledge Base.
Discussion on reviewing committee stipends due to increased workload.
Request to add the topic to the Governance Working Group (WG) agenda for further review.
Concerns raised about potential back pay for committee members elected in October.
Request for clarity on budget proposal submission requirements (line item vs. total budget).
Update on the Intersect Governance Working Group’s progress, including the finalization of the working group charter.
Purpose of the WG: To develop and refine governance processes within Intersect.
Plan to share the charter on Discord for review and ratification by the ISC.
Meeting Introduction
Intersect Committee Elections - Progress Update
Intersect Operational Budget Proposal 2025
Update from Business Function and Committees (If Any)
AOB & Meeting Close
Additional Attendees:
Valeria Devaux - Observer
Kyle Solomon - Co-Chair of Product Committee
Jonathan Kelly - Observer
Update shared on the ongoing Intersect committee elections.
A strong candidate turnout was noted, with 118 individuals running for committee positions.
Voting will open on Wednesday and run through May 7th, with results to be announced on May 12th.
Members are strongly encouraged to participate in the voting process.
Intersect Operational Budget Proposal is in the final review, and will be submitted by end of week.
Several committees, including the TSC, have submitted their budget proposals.
The TSC’s proposal was highlighted as comprehensive, covering maintenance, priority areas, and operational expenses.
Questions arose regarding the expected scope and detail of budget proposals.
Reminder: Committees should submit proposals via the designated portal.
The group discussed the upcoming special members meeting in response to a recent petition.
It was clarified that this will be a board meeting, with petitioners invited to participate—a compromise reached after internal discussions.
The board reaffirmed its commitment to transparency, member engagement, and addressing governance concerns raised in the petition.
Concerns were expressed about how recent budget process changes may affect committee autonomy and member engagement.
Members emphasized the need for clear accountability and more robust governance structures.
There was also discussion around improving communication between the board and the wider membership.
Participants highlighted the importance of better coordination between committees and working groups to minimize duplication of efforts.
A request was made for greater oversight from the ISC to ensure alignment and maintain quality across activities.
Name
Attendance
Role
Voting Seat (Y/N)
Yes
Secretary
N
Jack Briggs
Yes
Director of Ecosystem & Governance
Y
Lawrence Clark
Yes
Head of Operations
Y
Nick Cook
Yes
Head of Membership & Community Hubs
Y
YUTA
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Phil Lewis
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Thiago Nunes
Yes
Interim Community Member Seat
Y
Pedro Lucas
Yes
OSC Chair
Y
Samuel Leathers
Yes
Product Chair
Y
Darlington Welsh
Yes
MCC Chair
Y
Prof. Steven
Yes
CBC Chair
Y
Kevin Hammond
No
TSC Chair
Y
Seomon
Yes
GMC Chair
Y
Jose Miguel De Gamboa
No
CCC Chair
Y
Christian Taylor
Yes
Head of Open Source Office
N
Lorenzo Bruno
Yes
Head of Product
N
Yes
Head of Tech Operation
N
Duncan Soutar
Yes
Secretary of TSC
N
Lloyd Duhon
Yes
Secretary of Budget Committee
N
Larisa Mcfarlane
Yes
Secretary of Civics Committee
N
Terence McCutcheon
No
Secretary of OSC
N
Name
Attendance
Role
Voting Seat (Y/N)
Yes
Secretary
N
Jack Briggs
No
Director of Ecosystem
Y
Lawrence Clark
No
Head of Operations
Y
Nick Cook
Yes
Head of Membership & Community Hubs
Y
YUTA
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Phil Lewis
Yes
Community Member Seat
Y
Thiago Nunes
No
Interim Community Member Seat
Y
Pedro Lucas
Yes
OSC Chair
Y
Samuel Leathers
No
Product Chair
Y
Darlington Welsh
Yes
MCC Chair
Y
Prof. Steven
Yes
Chair of Board of Directors and CBC Chair
Y
Kevin Hammond
Yes
TSC Chair
Y
Seomon
No
GMC Chair
Y
Jose Miguel De Gamboa
No
CCC Chair
Y
Christian Taylor
No
Head of OSO
N
Lorenzo Bruno
No
Head of Product
N
Yes
Head of Tech Operation
N
Duncan Soutar
Yes
Secretary of TSC
N
Lloyd Duhon
No
Secretary of Budget Committee
N
Larisa Mcfarlane
No
Secretary of CCC
N
Terence McCutcheon
Yes
Secretary of OSC
N
No
WG Lead/Secretary
Phil Lewis
No
ISC Member
Thiago Nunes
Yes
Interim ISC Member
Pedro Lucas
Yes
OSC Chair, Representing two Enterprise Members
Nicholas Cerny
Yes
Civics Committee Chair
Vaibhav S
Yes
GMC Member
Naushad Fouze
No
Product Committee
Jose Iadicicco
Yes
Community Member
Maureen Wepngong
No
DRep
Terence McCutcheon
Yes
Intersect
Tevo Saks
No
Community Member
Lorenzo Bruno
Yes
Head of Product Curation
Process for Member Dismissal/Replacement
Terence McCutcheon presented a simplified, 3-slide process for dismissing non-participating members after an 8-week period. Key additions include the chair calling for a vote of no confidence and the secretary sending notification and removing access.
The process will be brought to the IC (Intersect Committee) on Monday, July 14, 2025, for approval to ensure it's in place before the next election cycle. Terence McCutcheon to share the updated presentation in the working group Discord channel.
Proposed Changes & Concerns:
- Nicolas Cerny suggested resignation letters also be submitted to the secretary for permanence, which was agreed to be a quick addition.
Terence McCutcheon to update the process to include submitting resignation letters to the secretary.
- Gintama suggested a resignation form for the member to sign after 8 weeks to maintain respect, but this was dismissed as the new application pack would include agreement to the removal process by proxy.
This suggestion was not adopted.
- Lorenzo Bruno suggested softening the language from "removal" to "replacement" or "dismissal" to reflect a vote of no confidence rather than forced removal. "Dismissal" was deemed more appropriate.
Terence McCutcheon to review and adjust language to "dismissal" as appropriate.
- Tim Richmond emphasized the need for clear, published rules and regulations for members to abide by, making dismissals a consequence of rule breaches rather than a negative perception.
This aligns with the "dead man's switch" concept and will be emphasized in communication.
- Lorenzo Bruno suggested making it explicit that dismissal is an extreme, last-resort case for the IC's context.
Terence McCutcheon to incorporate this context into the presentation for the IC.
- Lorenzo Bruno proposed IC approval for dismissal. This was deemed an overcomplication and indicative of a lack of trust between chairs and the IC by Terence McCutcheon.
This suggestion was not adopted.
- Tim Richmond and Nicolas Cerny supported informing the IC/Board, but not requiring their approval, to ensure interconnectedness and awareness. Tim Richmond suggested notifying the board if a chair is unresponsive after 3-4 weeks.
The process will include informing the IC and potentially the Board, but without requiring their direct approval for dismissals.
- Lorenzo Bruno questioned the "remove access" detail, but Terence McCutcheon clarified it's a standard operating procedure (SOP) for secretary action (e.g., Discord, Google Drive access).
The "remove access" detail remains in the process.
Applicant Side of Board Election
Discussion on how to ensure competent candidates are elected and address concerns about popularity contests.
Problems Identified:
- Increased chance of competent candidates being elected is a problem related to participation.
Ongoing discussion.
- "Popular people get elected" and "politically connected people" might be elected over competent ones.
Will be addressed through new initiatives and clearer communication.
- Lack of clarity on who should be eligible to apply.
To be defined and included in eligibility criteria.
- Lack of understanding of what the Board does.
Will be addressed by current Board members.
- Board members interfering too much in day-to-day activities and making unilateral decisions without member accountability.
This is an ongoing issue that needs to be addressed structurally.
Proposed Solutions/Considerations:
- Tim Richmond suggested current board members should engage with the community to explain their role through videos or direct engagement to demystify the board.
Current board members encouraged to create short videos explaining their role and responsibilities.
- Define eligibility criteria, such as a minimum membership duration (e.g., 6 months or 9-12 months for candidates vs. 6 months for voters).
Further discussion needed to balance experience with new talent.
- Require candidates to supply a certain number of written recommendations (e.g., 10) from other members to show membership support.
Further exploration of this idea is needed.
- Include more specific questions in the application that demonstrate business experience and concrete contributions to the Cardano ecosystem.
Terence McCutcheon to redesign application questions.
- Jose Iadicicco emphasized the need for directors with a broad understanding of Cardano's vision, philosophy, community, technical aspects, and political landscape.
Application questions and candidate profiles should aim to assess these qualities.
- Gintama suggested a potential conflict of interest if board members hold other powerful positions in the Cardano ecosystem (e.g., SPOs, CC).
This conflict of interest will be made explicit in communication regarding board elections.
- Terence McCutcheon proposed a "letter to the community" from each applicant, allowing them to explain why they should be elected and showcase professional skills/communication. Also, pre-application X Spaces for candidates to engage with the community.
Terence McCutcheon to implement the "letter to the community" and plan X Spaces for candidates.
- Tim Richmond emphasized proactive engagement with potential candidates in relevant forums to attract the best talent.
Information about board elections to be disseminated in places likely to reach ideal candidates.